CP9G.L vs. FLRK.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L).
CP9G.L and FLRK.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CP9G.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. It was launched on Feb 14, 2018. FLRK.L is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the MSCI Korea NR USD. It was launched on Jun 4, 2019. Both CP9G.L and FLRK.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CP9G.L vs. FLRK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CP9G.L vs. FLRK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CP9G.L Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR | 3.67% | 5.89% | 0.85% | -0.56% | -1.42% | 6.76% | 0.48% | 1.69% |
FLRK.L Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF | 33.25% | 82.09% | -20.56% | 14.16% | -19.37% | -5.90% | 42.60% | -14.15% |
Different Trading Currencies
CP9G.L is traded in GBp, while FLRK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLRK.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CP9G.L achieves a 3.67% return, which is significantly lower than FLRK.L's 33.25% return.
CP9G.L
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- YTD
- 3.67%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- 1Y
- 10.94%
- 3Y*
- 3.21%
- 5Y*
- 2.86%
- 10Y*
- 5.87%
FLRK.L
- 1D
- 9.23%
- 1M
- -10.91%
- YTD
- 33.25%
- 6M
- 64.38%
- 1Y
- 132.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.16%
- 5Y*
- 10.26%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CP9G.L vs. FLRK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CP9G.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRK.L's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CP9G.L vs. FLRK.L — Risk / Return Rank
CP9G.L
FLRK.L
CP9G.L vs. FLRK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CP9G.L | FLRK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.75 | 4.25 | -3.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.09 | 4.56 | -3.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.65 | -0.50 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 6.31 | -4.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.04 | 24.10 | -20.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CP9G.L | FLRK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 4.25 | -3.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.44 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.42 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between CP9G.L and FLRK.L is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CP9G.L vs. FLRK.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CP9G.L nor FLRK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CP9G.L vs. FLRK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CP9G.L drawdown since its inception was -32.32%, smaller than the maximum FLRK.L drawdown of -41.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CP9G.L and FLRK.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CP9G.L | FLRK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.32% | -41.57% | +9.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.72% | -21.18% | +12.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.14% | -38.88% | +20.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.43% | -13.91% | +9.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.09% | -20.35% | +14.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 5.55% | -2.85% |
Volatility
CP9G.L vs. FLRK.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L) is 6.38%, while Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLRK.L) has a volatility of 16.59%. This indicates that CP9G.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLRK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CP9G.L | FLRK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.38% | 16.59% | -10.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.87% | 27.15% | -17.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.65% | 31.15% | -16.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 23.21% | -9.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.72% | 26.13% | -10.41% |