PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FRXT.L vs. XMTW.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FRXT.LXMTW.L
YTD Return13.83%13.95%
1Y Return25.50%26.64%
Sharpe Ratio0.711.37
Daily Std Dev35.57%19.42%
Max Drawdown-26.62%-47.86%
Current Drawdown-11.47%-11.41%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.01.0

The correlation between FRXT.L and XMTW.L is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

FRXT.L vs. XMTW.L - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FRXT.L having a 13.83% return and XMTW.L slightly higher at 13.95%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
9.50%
10.24%
FRXT.L
XMTW.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FRXT.L vs. XMTW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRXT.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XMTW.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


XMTW.L
Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C
Expense ratio chart for XMTW.L: current value at 0.65% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.65%
Expense ratio chart for FRXT.L: current value at 0.19% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.19%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FRXT.L vs. XMTW.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF (FRXT.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (XMTW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRXT.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FRXT.L, currently valued at 0.93, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.93
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FRXT.L, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.55
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FRXT.L, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FRXT.L, currently valued at 1.78, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.78
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FRXT.L, currently valued at 3.67, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.003.67
XMTW.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XMTW.L, currently valued at 1.63, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.63
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XMTW.L, currently valued at 2.23, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.23
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XMTW.L, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XMTW.L, currently valued at 1.83, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.83
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XMTW.L, currently valued at 7.18, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.007.18

FRXT.L vs. XMTW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRXT.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the XMTW.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of FRXT.L and XMTW.L.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
0.93
1.63
FRXT.L
XMTW.L

Dividends

FRXT.L vs. XMTW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FRXT.L nor XMTW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FRXT.L vs. XMTW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRXT.L drawdown since its inception was -26.62%, smaller than the maximum XMTW.L drawdown of -47.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRXT.L and XMTW.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-10.23%
-10.00%
FRXT.L
XMTW.L

Volatility

FRXT.L vs. XMTW.L - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF (FRXT.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF 1C (XMTW.L) have volatilities of 6.40% and 6.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
6.40%
6.69%
FRXT.L
XMTW.L