PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FRXT.L vs. XDEV.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FRXT.LXDEV.L
YTD Return23.61%7.55%
1Y Return33.10%14.32%
Sharpe Ratio0.911.33
Sortino Ratio1.531.77
Omega Ratio1.291.25
Calmar Ratio1.591.79
Martin Ratio3.196.46
Ulcer Index10.34%2.15%
Daily Std Dev36.15%10.37%
Max Drawdown-26.62%-28.20%
Current Drawdown-3.87%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between FRXT.L and XDEV.L is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

FRXT.L vs. XDEV.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FRXT.L achieves a 23.61% return, which is significantly higher than XDEV.L's 7.55% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.18%
2.70%
FRXT.L
XDEV.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FRXT.L vs. XDEV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRXT.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XDEV.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


XDEV.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C
Expense ratio chart for XDEV.L: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%
Expense ratio chart for FRXT.L: current value at 0.19% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.19%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FRXT.L vs. XDEV.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF (FRXT.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRXT.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FRXT.L, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.06
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FRXT.L, currently valued at 1.71, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.71
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FRXT.L, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FRXT.L, currently valued at 2.07, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.07
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FRXT.L, currently valued at 4.26, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.004.26
XDEV.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XDEV.L, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.001.59
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XDEV.L, currently valued at 2.17, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.17
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XDEV.L, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XDEV.L, currently valued at 2.09, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.09
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XDEV.L, currently valued at 8.53, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.008.53

FRXT.L vs. XDEV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRXT.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the XDEV.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRXT.L and XDEV.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.06
1.59
FRXT.L
XDEV.L

Dividends

FRXT.L vs. XDEV.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FRXT.L nor XDEV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FRXT.L
Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDEV.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.74%

Drawdowns

FRXT.L vs. XDEV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRXT.L drawdown since its inception was -26.62%, smaller than the maximum XDEV.L drawdown of -28.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRXT.L and XDEV.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-4.12%
-1.99%
FRXT.L
XDEV.L

Volatility

FRXT.L vs. XDEV.L - Volatility Comparison

Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF (FRXT.L) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEV.L) at 2.83%. This indicates that FRXT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.44%
2.83%
FRXT.L
XDEV.L