PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CP9G.L vs. HMXD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CP9G.L vs. HMXD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L) and HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CP9G.L vs. HMXD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CP9G.L
Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR
3.67%5.89%0.85%-0.56%-1.42%6.76%0.48%13.35%-5.17%14.63%
HMXD.L
HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF
7.77%12.01%6.81%0.30%5.58%5.17%1.58%16.75%-6.22%14.77%
Different Trading Currencies

CP9G.L is traded in GBp, while HMXD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HMXD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CP9G.L achieves a 3.67% return, which is significantly lower than HMXD.L's 7.77% return. Over the past 10 years, CP9G.L has underperformed HMXD.L with an annualized return of 5.87%, while HMXD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.55% annualized return.


CP9G.L

1D
1.92%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
3.67%
6M
2.76%
1Y
10.94%
3Y*
3.21%
5Y*
2.86%
10Y*
5.87%

HMXD.L

1D
2.48%
1M
-3.05%
YTD
7.77%
6M
7.61%
1Y
21.98%
3Y*
9.99%
5Y*
6.70%
10Y*
8.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CP9G.L vs. HMXD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CP9G.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HMXD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CP9G.L vs. HMXD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CP9G.L
CP9G.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
CP9G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CP9G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
CP9G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
CP9G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
CP9G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

HMXD.L
HMXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
HMXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HMXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
HMXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HMXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
HMXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CP9G.L vs. HMXD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L) and HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CP9G.LHMXD.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.75

1.49

-0.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.09

1.96

-0.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.31

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

1.87

-0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.04

8.07

-4.04

CP9G.L vs. HMXD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CP9G.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the HMXD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CP9G.L and HMXD.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CP9G.LHMXD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

1.49

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.51

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.67

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.54

-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between CP9G.L and HMXD.L is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CP9G.L vs. HMXD.L - Dividend Comparison

CP9G.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CP9G.L
Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HMXD.L
HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF
3.12%3.30%3.86%4.09%4.06%2.81%2.85%3.74%4.15%3.09%3.62%4.31%

Drawdowns

CP9G.L vs. HMXD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CP9G.L drawdown since its inception was -32.32%, roughly equal to the maximum HMXD.L drawdown of -32.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CP9G.L and HMXD.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CP9G.LHMXD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.32%

-38.10%

+5.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.72%

-13.20%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.14%

-24.73%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.32%

-38.10%

+5.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.43%

-5.53%

+1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.09%

-8.01%

+1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

3.05%

-0.35%

Volatility

CP9G.L vs. HMXD.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L) has a higher volatility of 6.38% compared to HSBC MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF (HMXD.L) at 5.46%. This indicates that CP9G.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMXD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CP9G.LHMXD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.38%

5.46%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

9.18%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.65%

15.45%

-0.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.86%

17.02%

-3.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

21.08%

-5.36%