COYY vs. MBS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

COYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF) and MBS (Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while MBS is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Angel Oak. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. COYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MBS.

Performance

COYY vs. MBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COYY achieves a -29.65% return, which is significantly lower than MBS's 0.62% return.

COYY

• 1D: -2.87%
• 1M: -7.38%
• YTD: -29.65%
• 6M: -39.90%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MBS

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -0.22%
• YTD: 0.62%
• 6M: 0.84%
• 1Y: 6.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COYY vs. MBS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
COYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF	-29.65%	-38.98%
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	0.62%	4.37%

Correlation

The correlation between COYY and MBS is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	-0.01

Return for Risk

COYY vs. MBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBS

MBS Risk / Return Rank: 69
MBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
MBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
MBS Omega Ratio Rank: 75
MBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
MBS Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COYY vs. MBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COYY	MBS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.74	1.60	-3.34

Drawdowns

COYY vs. MBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COYY drawdown since its inception was -58.58%, which is greater than MBS's maximum drawdown of -4.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COYY and MBS.

Drawdown Indicators

	COYY	MBS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.58%	-4.09%	-54.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.58%	-1.46%	-57.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.21%	-1.02%	-34.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.70%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	COYY	MBS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.90%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.39%	2.93%	+33.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.39%	3.99%	+32.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.39%	3.99%	+32.40%

COYY vs. MBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

COYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than MBS's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

COYY vs. MBS - Dividend Comparison

COYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 386.46%, more than MBS's 5.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
COYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF	386.46%	132.14%	0.00%
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF	5.61%	5.28%	4.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COYY and MBS in my portfolio?

COYY and MBS have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, COYY or MBS?

On fees, MBS is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, COYY or MBS?

MBS is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for COYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COYY or MBS?

COYY has the higher dividend yield at 386.46%, compared with 5.61% for MBS.

What is the main difference between COYY and MBS?

COYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while MBS is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Angel Oak. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for COYY and 0.49% for MBS.