COYY vs. LFGY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY).

COYY and LFGY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COYY is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Jul 28, 2025. LFGY is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Jan 13, 2025.

Performance

COYY vs. LFGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

COYY vs. LFGY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
COYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF	-24.24%	-38.98%
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	-7.99%	-11.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COYY achieves a -24.24% return, which is significantly lower than LFGY's -7.99% return.

COYY

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: -3.22%
• YTD: -24.24%
• 6M: -51.89%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LFGY

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -3.25%
• YTD: -7.99%
• 6M: -24.51%
• 1Y: 6.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COYY vs. LFGY - Expense Ratio Comparison

COYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LFGY's 0.99% expense ratio.

COYY

GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF

LFGY

YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF

Return for Risk

COYY vs. LFGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFGY

LFGY Risk / Return Rank: 17
LFGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
LFGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
LFGY Omega Ratio Rank: 17
LFGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
LFGY Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COYY vs. LFGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY) and YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COYY	LFGY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.74	-0.31	-1.43

Correlation

The correlation between COYY and LFGY is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

COYY vs. LFGY - Dividend Comparison

COYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 290.71%, more than LFGY's 106.59% yield.

	TTM	2025
COYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF	290.71%	132.14%
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	106.59%	94.90%

Drawdowns

COYY vs. LFGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COYY drawdown since its inception was -58.26%, which is greater than LFGY's maximum drawdown of -35.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COYY and LFGY.

Drawdown Indicators

	COYY	LFGY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.26%	-35.94%	-22.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-35.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.39%	-29.72%	-25.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.15%	-14.03%	-16.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	15.17%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	COYY	LFGY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.92%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	30.83%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.27%	40.15%	-0.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.27%	42.68%	-3.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.27%	42.68%	-3.41%