COYY vs. HOOW
COYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF) and HOOW (Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while HOOW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. COYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for HOOW.
Performance
COYY vs. HOOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COYY achieves a -31.65% return, which is significantly lower than HOOW's -12.18% return.
COYY
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -2.31%
- 6M
- -33.70%
- YTD
- -31.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOOW
- 1D
- -9.53%
- 1M
- 10.78%
- 6M
- -9.72%
- YTD
- -12.18%
- 1Y
- -6.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COYY vs. HOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF | -31.65% | -40.04% |
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | -12.18% | 1.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between COYY and HOOW is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COYY vs. HOOW — Risk / Return Rank
COYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HOOW
COYY vs. HOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COYY | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.06 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.11 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.18 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COYY vs. HOOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COYY drawdown since its inception was -60.85%, smaller than the maximum HOOW drawdown of -65.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COYY and HOOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COYY | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.85% | -65.74% | +4.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -65.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.75% | -40.36% | -19.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.98% | -30.49% | -7.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 39.31% | — |
Volatility
COYY vs. HOOW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COYY | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 24.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 64.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.51% | 84.21% | -49.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.51% | 83.98% | -49.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.51% | 83.98% | -49.47% |
COYY vs. HOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
COYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
COYY vs. HOOW - Dividend Comparison
COYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 441.99%, more than HOOW's 133.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
COYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF | 441.99% | 132.14% |
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | 133.11% | 67.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COYY and HOOW have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HOOW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOOW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for COYY.
COYY has the higher dividend yield at 441.99%, compared with 133.11% for HOOW.
COYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while HOOW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for COYY and 0.99% for HOOW.
Find the right allocation for COYY and HOOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer