COWZ vs. WTV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) and WTV (WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. COWZ is passively managed, while WTV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, COWZ returned 9.90%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for WTV. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. COWZ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for WTV.

Performance

COWZ vs. WTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COWZ achieves a 3.27% return, which is significantly lower than WTV's 10.06% return.

COWZ

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: -3.72%
• YTD: 3.27%
• 6M: 2.69%
• 1Y: 15.76%
• 3Y*: 12.38%
• 5Y*: 9.90%
• 10Y*: —

WTV

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 10.06%
• 6M: 9.41%
• 1Y: 22.34%
• 3Y*: 21.29%
• 5Y*: 13.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COWZ vs. WTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	3.27%	8.98%	10.64%	14.73%	0.19%	42.57%	11.65%	23.41%	-10.05%	2.67%
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund	10.06%	13.51%	23.99%	22.35%	-8.06%	30.59%	6.15%	29.69%	-8.29%	1.58%

Correlation

The correlation between COWZ and WTV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2017	0.89

The correlation between COWZ and WTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

COWZ vs. WTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	COWZ	WTV
Healthcare	21.8%	7.5%
Energy	16.9%	6.4%
Technology	16.0%	18.3%
Consumer Cyclical	11.7%	10.6%
Consumer Defensive	10.9%	9.9%
Communication Services	10.4%	6.5%
Industrials	8.4%	10.3%
Basic Materials	3.7%	2.2%
Financial Services	-	18.5%
Real Estate	-	5.4%
Utilities	-	4.5%

Return for Risk

COWZ vs. WTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COWZ

COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 45
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 39
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 48

WTV

WTV Risk / Return Rank: 61
WTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
WTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
WTV Omega Ratio Rank: 57
WTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
WTV Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COWZ vs. WTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COWZ	WTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	1.89	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	2.75	-0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.34	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	3.14	-0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.92	10.16	-2.25

COWZ vs. WTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COWZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the WTV Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COWZ and WTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COWZ vs. WTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COWZ drawdown since its inception was -38.63%, smaller than the maximum WTV drawdown of -42.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWZ and WTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	COWZ	WTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.63%	-42.18%	+3.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.95%	-7.15%	+1.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.00%	-18.49%	-3.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.00%	-19.30%	-2.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.40%	-1.54%	-3.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.80%	-5.03%	+0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	2.20%	-0.20%

Volatility

COWZ vs. WTV - Volatility Comparison

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund (WTV) at 3.65%. This indicates that COWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COWZ	WTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.97%	3.65%	+0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.53%	8.20%	-0.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.38%	11.90%	-0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.64%	17.08%	+0.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.90%	20.16%	-0.26%

COWZ vs. WTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

COWZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than WTV's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

COWZ vs. WTV - Dividend Comparison

COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than WTV's 1.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	2.00%	2.19%	1.82%	1.92%	1.96%	1.48%	2.54%	1.96%	1.67%	1.95%	0.13%
WTV WisdomTree U.S. Value Fund	1.66%	1.59%	1.54%	1.62%	2.08%	1.55%	1.63%	1.44%	1.94%	0.41%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COWZ and WTV in my portfolio?

COWZ and WTV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COWZ or WTV?

COWZ has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to WTV (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COWZ dropped -38.63% vs WTV's -42.18%.

Which ETF is better, COWZ or WTV?

On 5-year performance, WTV leads with 13.43% vs 9.90% for COWZ. On fees, WTV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, WTV has been the lower-risk option at 3.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, COWZ or WTV?

Over the 5-year period, WTV has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 9.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, COWZ or WTV?

WTV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COWZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COWZ or WTV?

COWZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 1.66% for WTV.

What is the main difference between COWZ and WTV?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for COWZ and 0.12% for WTV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.