COWZ vs. SCHX
COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index, while SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, COWZ returned 10.13%/yr vs 12.76%/yr for SCHX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. COWZ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
COWZ vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COWZ achieves a 6.93% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 8.86% return.
COWZ
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 6.93%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- 19.20%
- 3Y*
- 13.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- 8.86%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 25.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.35%
COWZ vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 6.93% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 14.73% | 0.19% | 42.57% | 11.65% | 23.41% | -10.05% | 20.22% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 8.86% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 21.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between COWZ and SCHX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2016 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between COWZ and SCHX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
COWZ vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
COWZ
SCHX
Healthcare
Energy
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
COWZ
SCHX
Energy
COWZ
SCHX
Technology
COWZ
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
COWZ
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
COWZ
SCHX
Communication Services
COWZ
SCHX
Industrials
COWZ
SCHX
Basic Materials
COWZ
SCHX
Financial Services
COWZ
-
SCHX
Real Estate
COWZ
-
SCHX
Utilities
COWZ
-
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COWZ vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
COWZ
SCHX
COWZ vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COWZ | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 2.63 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.73 | 11.65 | -1.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COWZ vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COWZ drawdown since its inception was -38.63%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWZ and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COWZ | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.63% | -34.33% | -4.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.00% | -9.02% | +4.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.00% | -19.04% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.00% | -25.41% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.05% | -2.37% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.80% | -3.96% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 2.04% | -0.16% |
Volatility
COWZ vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) is 3.27%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that COWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COWZ | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 4.47% | -1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.20% | 9.71% | -2.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.19% | 12.47% | -1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 17.19% | +0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.91% | 18.17% | +1.74% |
COWZ vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
COWZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
COWZ vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than SCHX's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.93% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.02% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COWZ and SCHX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHX has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to COWZ (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COWZ dropped -38.63% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 5-year performance, SCHX leads with 12.76% vs 10.13% for COWZ. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, COWZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 10.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COWZ.
COWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 1.02% for SCHX.
COWZ is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for COWZ and 0.03% for SCHX.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COWZ and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer