COWZ vs. FBND
COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) and FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index, while FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. COWZ is passively managed, while FBND is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, COWZ returned 10.11%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for FBND. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COWZ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FBND.
Performance
COWZ vs. FBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COWZ achieves a 6.41% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's 0.10% return.
COWZ
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 6.41%
- 6M
- 7.19%
- 1Y
- 19.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.26%
- 5Y*
- 10.11%
- 10Y*
- —
FBND
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- 0.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
COWZ vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 6.41% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 14.73% | 0.19% | 42.57% | 11.65% | 23.41% | -10.05% | 20.22% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.10% | 7.57% | 2.13% | 6.81% | -12.54% | -0.43% | 9.41% | 9.82% | -0.57% | 3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between COWZ and FBND is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016 | 0.05 |
The correlation between COWZ and FBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
COWZ vs. FBND - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
COWZ
FBND
Healthcare
-
Energy
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
COWZ
FBND
-
Energy
COWZ
FBND
Technology
COWZ
FBND
-
Consumer Cyclical
COWZ
FBND
-
Consumer Defensive
COWZ
FBND
-
Communication Services
COWZ
FBND
-
Industrials
COWZ
FBND
Basic Materials
COWZ
FBND
-
Financial Services
COWZ
-
FBND
Real Estate
COWZ
-
FBND
-
Utilities
COWZ
-
FBND
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COWZ vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank
COWZ
FBND
COWZ vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COWZ | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.25 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | 2.01 | +1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.52 | 5.97 | +4.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COWZ | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.41 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.12 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.44 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
COWZ vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COWZ drawdown since its inception was -38.63%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWZ and FBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COWZ | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.63% | -17.25% | -21.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.00% | -2.66% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.00% | -5.94% | -16.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.00% | -17.25% | -4.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.53% | -1.82% | -0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.80% | -3.35% | -1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 0.90% | +0.94% |
Volatility
COWZ vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.23%. This indicates that COWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COWZ | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 1.23% | +1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.21% | 2.75% | +4.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.16% | 3.80% | +7.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 5.92% | +11.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.92% | 6.10% | +13.82% |
COWZ vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
COWZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
COWZ vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison
COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than FBND's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.94% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.72% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COWZ and FBND have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COWZ has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to FBND (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COWZ dropped -38.63% vs FBND's -17.25%.
On 5-year performance, COWZ leads with 10.11% vs 0.68% for FBND. On fees, FBND is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, FBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 10.11% return vs 0.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FBND is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COWZ.
FBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 1.94% for COWZ.
COWZ is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for COWZ and 0.36% for FBND.
COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COWZ and FBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer