PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COWZ vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COWZ vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COWZ achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 71.26% return.


COWZ

1D
0.58%
1M
5.50%
6M
8.21%
YTD
12.39%
1Y
24.54%
3Y*
11.99%
5Y*
11.04%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.03%

DBE

1D
-4.26%
1M
15.98%
6M
57.84%
YTD
71.26%
1Y
61.44%
3Y*
15.22%
5Y*
17.82%
10Y*
12.24%
ALL TIME*
2.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$63.88M$58.45M$60.21M
$1.27M$1.08M$1.67M

COWZ vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
12.39%8.98%10.64%14.73%0.19%42.57%11.65%23.41%-10.05%20.22%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
71.26%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%57.56%-25.91%19.72%-12.95%5.21%

Correlation

The correlation between COWZ and DBE is -0.11, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2016

0.30

The correlation between COWZ and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COWZ vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

COWZ
COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

COWZ vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COWZDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.28

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

2.50

+1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.12

7.82

+4.30

COWZ vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COWZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COWZ and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COWZ vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COWZ drawdown since its inception was -38.63%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWZ and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COWZDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.63%

-86.69%

+48.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.95%

-24.72%

+18.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.00%

-24.72%

+2.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.00%

-38.74%

+16.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-34.98%

+34.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.76%

-57.13%

+52.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

7.90%

-5.87%

Volatility

COWZ vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) is 4.86%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 15.07%. This indicates that COWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COWZDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

15.07%

-10.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.75%

34.26%

-25.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

37.66%

-25.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.69%

30.15%

-12.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.86%

28.60%

-8.74%

COWZ vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

COWZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

COWZ vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than DBE's 2.26% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.84%2.19%1.82%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.26%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


COWZ and DBE have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBE has higher volatility (15.07%) compared to COWZ (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COWZ dropped -38.63% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 5-year performance, DBE leads with 17.82% vs 11.04% for COWZ. On fees, COWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, COWZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBE has performed better with a 17.82% return vs 11.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.26%, compared with 1.84% for COWZ.

COWZ is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for COWZ and 0.78% for DBE.

COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COWZ and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer