PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COWZ vs. BCSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COWZ vs. BCSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COWZ achieves a 6.93% return, which is significantly higher than BCSVX's -11.70% return.


COWZ

1D
0.82%
1M
1.88%
YTD
6.93%
6M
6.01%
1Y
18.17%
3Y*
13.01%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*

BCSVX

1D
1.45%
1M
3.77%
YTD
-11.70%
6M
-11.62%
1Y
-22.10%
3Y*
-0.05%
5Y*
-3.94%
10Y*
7.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COWZ vs. BCSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
6.93%8.98%10.64%14.73%0.19%42.57%11.65%23.41%-10.05%20.22%
BCSVX
Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund
-11.70%-2.30%8.17%20.04%-31.56%12.69%44.75%26.41%-3.39%36.56%

Correlation

The correlation between COWZ and BCSVX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2016

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COWZ vs. BCSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COWZ
COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

BCSVX
BCSVX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
BCSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
BCSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COWZ vs. BCSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COWZBCSVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.80

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

-0.68

+4.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.73

-1.27

+11.00

COWZ vs. BCSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COWZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the BCSVX Sharpe Ratio of -1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COWZ and BCSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COWZ vs. BCSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COWZ drawdown since its inception was -38.63%, smaller than the maximum BCSVX drawdown of -43.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWZ and BCSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COWZBCSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.63%

-43.93%

+5.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.00%

-32.35%

+27.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.00%

-32.35%

+10.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.00%

-43.93%

+21.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

-26.44%

+24.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.80%

-12.15%

+7.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

17.30%

-15.42%

Volatility

COWZ vs. BCSVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) is 3.27%, while Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund (BCSVX) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that COWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COWZBCSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

4.90%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.20%

14.03%

-6.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.19%

17.07%

-5.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.64%

18.70%

-1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.91%

17.14%

+2.77%

COWZ vs. BCSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

COWZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BCSVX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

COWZ vs. BCSVX - Dividend Comparison

COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than BCSVX's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BCSVX
Brown Capital Management International Small Company Fund
0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.07%0.74%0.30%0.31%0.00%0.00%
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.93%2.19%1.82%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


COWZ and BCSVX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCSVX has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to COWZ (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COWZ dropped -38.63% vs BCSVX's -43.93%.

COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COWZ and BCSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer