PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COWS vs. DIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COWS vs. DIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COWS achieves a 16.71% return, which is significantly lower than DIV's 17.66% return.


COWS

1D
0.16%
1M
4.92%
6M
14.74%
YTD
16.71%
1Y
32.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.58%

DIV

1D
-0.48%
1M
2.37%
6M
9.80%
YTD
17.66%
1Y
21.05%
3Y*
11.65%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*
4.23%
ALL TIME*
4.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$328.33K$310.96K$216.44K
$4.26M$4.15M$4.38M

COWS vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
COWS
Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF
16.71%15.29%11.08%9.31%
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
17.66%3.10%11.27%6.11%

Correlation

The correlation between COWS and DIV is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023

0.70

The correlation between COWS and DIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

COWS vs. DIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
COWS
DIV

Consumer Cyclical

18.5%
4.0%

Technology

17.8%

-

Industrials

16.3%
12.1%

Financial Services

15.9%
4.0%

Healthcare

11.4%
3.3%

Energy

8.7%
20.5%

Basic Materials

6.1%
6.2%

Communication Services

2.7%
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
10.8%

Utilities

2.3%
11.6%

Real Estate

-

21.3%

Consumer Cyclical

COWS
18.5%
DIV
4.0%

Technology

COWS
17.8%
DIV

-

Industrials

COWS
16.3%
DIV
12.1%

Financial Services

COWS
15.9%
DIV
4.0%

Healthcare

COWS
11.4%
DIV
3.3%

Energy

COWS
8.7%
DIV
20.5%

Basic Materials

COWS
6.1%
DIV
6.2%

Communication Services

COWS
2.7%
DIV
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

COWS
2.6%
DIV
10.8%

Utilities

COWS
2.3%
DIV
11.6%

Real Estate

COWS

-

DIV
21.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COWS vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

COWS
COWS Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
COWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWS Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
COWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

DIV
DIV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
DIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

COWS vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COWSDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.33

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.65

3.93

+0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.02

11.48

+3.54

COWS vs. DIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COWS Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the DIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COWS and DIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COWS vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COWS drawdown since its inception was -24.76%, smaller than the maximum DIV drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWS and DIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COWSDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.76%

-52.74%

+27.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.44%

-5.13%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-2.04%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.77%

-6.96%

+3.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.76%

+0.23%

Volatility

COWS vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) at 3.25%. This indicates that COWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COWSDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

3.25%

+1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.87%

7.73%

+3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.20%

10.53%

+5.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.71%

13.69%

+5.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.71%

18.00%

+0.71%

COWS vs. DIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

COWS has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than DIV's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

COWS vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison

COWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than DIV's 6.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COWS
Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF
1.46%2.04%2.08%0.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DIV
Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF
6.54%7.30%5.74%7.13%6.62%5.24%8.01%7.65%7.08%5.92%6.78%8.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


COWS and DIV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COWS has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to DIV (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COWS dropped -24.76% vs DIV's -52.74%.

On 1-year performance, COWS leads with 32.48% vs 21.05% for DIV. On fees, COWS is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, COWS has performed better with a 32.48% return vs 21.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COWS is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.

DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.54%, compared with 1.46% for COWS.

COWS tracks Kelly US Cash Flow Dividend Leaders Index, while DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for COWS and 0.45% for DIV.

DIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COWS and DIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer