COWS vs. BAGY
COWS (Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF) and BAGY (Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COWS is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Kelly US Cash Flow Dividend Leaders Index, while BAGY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. COWS is passively managed, while BAGY is actively managed. Over the past year, COWS returned 30.18% vs -37.04% for BAGY. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COWS charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BAGY.
Performance
COWS vs. BAGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COWS achieves a 9.22% return, which is significantly higher than BAGY's -21.90% return.
COWS
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 9.22%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- 30.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAGY
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -20.28%
- YTD
- -21.90%
- 6M
- -24.70%
- 1Y
- -37.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COWS vs. BAGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COWS Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF | 9.22% | 27.77% |
BAGY Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF | -21.90% | -8.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between COWS and BAGY is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025 | 0.34 |
COWS vs. BAGY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
COWS
BAGY
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
COWS
BAGY
-
Industrials
COWS
BAGY
-
Financial Services
COWS
BAGY
Consumer Cyclical
COWS
BAGY
-
Energy
COWS
BAGY
-
Healthcare
COWS
BAGY
-
Basic Materials
COWS
BAGY
-
Communication Services
COWS
BAGY
-
Utilities
COWS
BAGY
-
Consumer Defensive
COWS
BAGY
-
Real Estate
COWS
-
BAGY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COWS vs. BAGY — Risk / Return Rank
COWS
BAGY
COWS vs. BAGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) and Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COWS | BAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | -0.89 | +2.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.76 | -1.20 | +3.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.86 | +0.47 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.71 | -0.78 | +5.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.35 | -1.41 | +15.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COWS | BAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | -0.89 | +2.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | -0.66 | +1.56 |
Drawdowns
COWS vs. BAGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COWS drawdown since its inception was -24.76%, smaller than the maximum BAGY drawdown of -47.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWS and BAGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COWS | BAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.76% | -47.52% | +22.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.44% | -47.52% | +41.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -45.06% | +44.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -19.61% | +15.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 26.28% | -24.17% |
Volatility
COWS vs. BAGY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) is 4.58%, while Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY) has a volatility of 9.89%. This indicates that COWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COWS | BAGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 9.89% | -5.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.09% | 33.39% | -23.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.21% | 41.93% | -25.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 40.86% | -22.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 40.86% | -22.01% |
COWS vs. BAGY - Expense Ratio Comparison
COWS has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BAGY's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
COWS vs. BAGY - Dividend Comparison
COWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than BAGY's 58.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BAGY Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF | 58.25% | 30.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COWS Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF | 1.60% | 2.04% | 2.08% | 0.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COWS and BAGY have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BAGY has higher volatility (9.89%) compared to COWS (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COWS dropped -24.76% vs BAGY's -47.52%.
On 1-year performance, COWS leads with 30.18% vs -37.04% for BAGY. On fees, COWS is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, COWS has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COWS has performed better with a 30.18% return vs -37.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COWS is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BAGY.
BAGY has the higher dividend yield at 58.25%, compared with 1.60% for COWS.
COWS is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while BAGY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for COWS and 0.65% for BAGY.
COWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COWS and BAGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer