COTZX vs. INCO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

COTZX (Columbia Thermostat Fund) and INCO (Columbia India Consumer ETF) are both funds - COTZX is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by Columbia, while INCO is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Indxx India Consumer Index. Over the past 10 years, COTZX returned 7.37%/yr vs 8.58%/yr for INCO. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COTZX charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for INCO.

Performance

COTZX vs. INCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX) and Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COTZX achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly higher than INCO's -11.00% return. Over the past 10 years, COTZX has underperformed INCO with an annualized return of 7.37%, while INCO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.58% annualized return.

COTZX

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 2.65%
• 6M: 3.13%
• 1Y: 10.49%
• 3Y*: 10.37%
• 5Y*: 4.48%
• 10Y*: 7.37%

INCO

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: -0.62%
• YTD: -11.00%
• 6M: -8.63%
• 1Y: -9.99%
• 3Y*: 6.54%
• 5Y*: 5.97%
• 10Y*: 8.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COTZX vs. INCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
COTZX Columbia Thermostat Fund	2.65%	15.02%	7.98%	11.66%	-12.92%	6.44%	29.61%	15.15%	-1.17%	3.33%
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF	-11.00%	0.59%	12.70%	34.63%	-7.01%	19.28%	14.55%	-4.22%	-10.81%	53.28%

Correlation

The correlation between COTZX and INCO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2011	0.36

Return for Risk

COTZX vs. INCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COTZX

COTZX Risk / Return Rank: 75
COTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
COTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
COTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
COTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
COTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

INCO

INCO Risk / Return Rank: 5
INCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
INCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
INCO Omega Ratio Rank: 4
INCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
INCO Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COTZX vs. INCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX) and Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COTZX	INCO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	-0.59	+2.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.00	-0.77	+3.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	0.91	+0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	-0.47	+3.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.45	-1.15	+13.61

COTZX vs. INCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COTZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the INCO Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COTZX and INCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COTZX vs. INCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COTZX drawdown since its inception was -47.48%, roughly equal to the maximum INCO drawdown of -47.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTZX and INCO.

Drawdown Indicators

	COTZX	INCO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.48%	-47.69%	+0.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.02%	-21.37%	+17.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.93%	-29.98%	+23.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.80%	-29.98%	+12.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.80%	-47.69%	+29.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.82%	-24.21%	+23.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.46%	-10.60%	+7.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.87%	8.68%	-7.81%

Volatility

COTZX vs. INCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Thermostat Fund (COTZX) is 2.19%, while Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that COTZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COTZX	INCO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.19%	4.56%	-2.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.28%	14.25%	-9.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.30%	16.92%	-11.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.37%	16.91%	-9.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.41%	20.31%	-12.90%

COTZX vs. INCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

COTZX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than INCO's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

COTZX vs. INCO - Dividend Comparison

COTZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, while INCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COTZX Columbia Thermostat Fund	3.28%	3.37%	3.55%	2.74%	3.28%	14.82%	6.92%	5.57%	4.45%	3.13%	2.66%	4.26%
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	2.88%	3.81%	10.57%	6.25%	0.34%	0.28%	0.12%	0.05%	0.09%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COTZX and INCO in my portfolio?

COTZX and INCO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COTZX or INCO?

INCO has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to COTZX (2.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COTZX dropped -47.48% vs INCO's -47.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COTZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.