PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COTN.L vs. ZINC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COTN.L vs. ZINC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Cotton (COTN.L) and WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COTN.L achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly lower than ZINC.L's 15.82% return. Over the past 10 years, COTN.L has underperformed ZINC.L with an annualized return of 1.32%, while ZINC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.37% annualized return.


COTN.L

1D
-2.76%
1M
-11.68%
YTD
9.87%
6M
10.29%
1Y
4.16%
3Y*
-7.96%
5Y*
-0.13%
10Y*
1.32%

ZINC.L

1D
-0.57%
1M
6.40%
YTD
15.82%
6M
17.29%
1Y
38.82%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
5.86%
10Y*
7.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COTN.L vs. ZINC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COTN.L
WisdomTree Cotton
9.87%-11.34%-16.60%-1.06%-8.04%41.68%7.77%-7.05%-7.59%10.38%
ZINC.L
WisdomTree Zinc
15.82%6.70%13.11%-9.01%-11.08%26.65%15.73%-0.07%-22.41%27.77%

Correlation

The correlation between COTN.L and ZINC.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2006

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COTN.L vs. ZINC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COTN.L
COTN.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
COTN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COTN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
COTN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
COTN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
COTN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

ZINC.L
ZINC.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ZINC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZINC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZINC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ZINC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZINC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COTN.L vs. ZINC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cotton (COTN.L) and WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COTN.LZINC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.34

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

3.60

-3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.63

13.28

-12.65

COTN.L vs. ZINC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COTN.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the ZINC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COTN.L and ZINC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COTN.LZINC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

2.12

-1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

0.23

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

0.31

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

-0.03

+0.03

Drawdowns

COTN.L vs. ZINC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COTN.L drawdown since its inception was -73.59%, smaller than the maximum ZINC.L drawdown of -77.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTN.L and ZINC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COTN.LZINC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.59%

-77.49%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.44%

-10.74%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.70%

-19.66%

-24.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.70%

-47.04%

-6.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.70%

-47.04%

-6.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.25%

-36.98%

-20.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.78%

-56.38%

+6.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.57%

2.90%

+3.67%

Volatility

COTN.L vs. ZINC.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Cotton (COTN.L) has a higher volatility of 10.54% compared to WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L) at 4.90%. This indicates that COTN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZINC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COTN.LZINC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.54%

4.90%

+5.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.14%

14.12%

+1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.16%

18.26%

-1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.57%

25.18%

+2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.06%

23.98%

+1.08%

COTN.L vs. ZINC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both COTN.L and ZINC.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

COTN.L vs. ZINC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither COTN.L nor ZINC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


COTN.L and ZINC.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COTN.L and ZINC.L have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

COTN.L is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while ZINC.L is Metals. COTN.L tracks Bloomberg Cotton, while ZINC.L tracks Bloomberg Zinc.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COTN.L and ZINC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer