COTN.L vs. FAGR.L
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Cotton (COTN.L) and WisdomTree Agriculture Longer Dated (FAGR.L).
COTN.L and FAGR.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COTN.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Cotton. It was launched on Sep 22, 2006. FAGR.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Agriculture 3 Month Forward. It was launched on Oct 10, 2007. Both COTN.L and FAGR.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
COTN.L vs. FAGR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
COTN.L vs. FAGR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COTN.L WisdomTree Cotton | 5.57% | -11.34% | -16.60% | -1.06% | -8.04% | 41.68% | 7.77% | 16.81% |
FAGR.L WisdomTree Agriculture Longer Dated | 5.69% | 0.20% | -7.02% | -4.05% | 16.44% | 29.51% | 11.44% | 6.28% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with COTN.L having a 5.57% return and FAGR.L slightly higher at 5.69%.
COTN.L
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- 8.14%
- YTD
- 5.57%
- 6M
- 2.28%
- 1Y
- -4.62%
- 3Y*
- -8.13%
- 5Y*
- 0.51%
- 10Y*
- 2.03%
FAGR.L
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 4.38%
- YTD
- 5.69%
- 6M
- 6.49%
- 1Y
- 0.33%
- 3Y*
- -1.77%
- 5Y*
- 6.22%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COTN.L vs. FAGR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both COTN.L and FAGR.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Return for Risk
COTN.L vs. FAGR.L — Risk / Return Rank
COTN.L
FAGR.L
COTN.L vs. FAGR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Cotton (COTN.L) and WisdomTree Agriculture Longer Dated (FAGR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COTN.L | FAGR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | 0.03 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | 0.12 | -0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.01 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 0.18 | -0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.59 | 0.33 | -0.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COTN.L | FAGR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 | 0.03 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.53 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.80 | -0.81 |
Correlation
The correlation between COTN.L and FAGR.L is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
COTN.L vs. FAGR.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither COTN.L nor FAGR.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
COTN.L vs. FAGR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COTN.L drawdown since its inception was -73.59%, which is greater than FAGR.L's maximum drawdown of -29.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTN.L and FAGR.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| COTN.L | FAGR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.59% | -29.85% | -43.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.45% | -7.99% | -6.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.70% | -29.85% | -23.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.93% | -19.40% | -39.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.73% | -15.18% | -34.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.37% | 4.22% | +4.15% |
Volatility
COTN.L vs. FAGR.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Cotton (COTN.L) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to WisdomTree Agriculture Longer Dated (FAGR.L) at 3.85%. This indicates that COTN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAGR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| COTN.L | FAGR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | 3.85% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.81% | 7.99% | +1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.01% | 12.29% | +3.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.44% | 23.96% | +3.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.87% | 26.38% | -1.51% |