COTG vs. TSLG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) and TSLG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

COTG vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COTG achieves a 15.84% return, which is significantly higher than TSLG's -37.23% return.

COTG

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: -14.19%
• YTD: 15.84%
• 6M: 17.42%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TSLG

• 1D: -11.63%
• 1M: -22.10%
• YTD: -37.23%
• 6M: -46.41%
• 1Y: -12.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COTG vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF	15.84%	-22.61%
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF	-37.23%	1.26%

Correlation

The correlation between COTG and TSLG is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025	-0.16

Return for Risk

COTG vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COTG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TSLG

TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 8
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 10
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COTG vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COTG	TSLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.15	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.41	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.05	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.23	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.47	—

Drawdowns

COTG vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COTG drawdown since its inception was -25.69%, smaller than the maximum TSLG drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTG and TSLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	COTG	TSLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.69%	-82.86%	+57.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-54.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.45%	-68.29%	+43.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.72%	-58.78%	+49.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	27.68%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	COTG	TSLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	29.15%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	57.01%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.02%	89.25%	-49.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.02%	115.05%	-75.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.02%	115.05%	-75.03%

COTG vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both COTG and TSLG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

COTG vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison

COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.43%.

Position	TTM	2025
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF	10.43%	6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COTG and TSLG in my portfolio?

COTG and TSLG have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, COTG or TSLG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, COTG or TSLG?

COTG and TSLG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COTG or TSLG?

TSLG has the higher dividend yield at 10.43%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.