COTG vs. TRFK

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) and TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COTG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while TRFK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net. COTG is actively managed, while TRFK is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. COTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TRFK.

Performance

COTG vs. TRFK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COTG achieves a 14.10% return, which is significantly lower than TRFK's 73.54% return.

COTG

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -15.48%
• YTD: 14.10%
• 6M: 16.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRFK

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: 17.60%
• YTD: 73.54%
• 6M: 71.63%
• 1Y: 102.07%
• 3Y*: 54.57%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COTG vs. TRFK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF	14.10%	-22.61%
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF	73.54%	-2.60%

Correlation

The correlation between COTG and TRFK is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025	-0.22

Return for Risk

COTG vs. TRFK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COTG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TRFK

TRFK Risk / Return Rank: 85
TRFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
TRFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
TRFK Omega Ratio Rank: 85
TRFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
TRFK Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COTG vs. TRFK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COTG	TRFK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.29	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.74	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.49	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.25	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.34	—

Drawdowns

COTG vs. TRFK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COTG drawdown since its inception was -25.69%, smaller than the maximum TRFK drawdown of -29.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTG and TRFK.

Drawdown Indicators

	COTG	TRFK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.69%	-29.06%	+3.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-19.56%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.58%	0.00%	-25.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.64%	-6.04%	-3.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.30%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	COTG	TRFK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	16.55%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	25.37%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.09%	31.24%	+8.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.09%	29.64%	+10.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.09%	29.64%	+10.45%

COTG vs. TRFK - Expense Ratio Comparison

COTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TRFK's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

COTG vs. TRFK - Dividend Comparison

COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.40%	0.20%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COTG and TRFK in my portfolio?

COTG and TRFK have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, COTG or TRFK?

On fees, TRFK is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, COTG or TRFK?

TRFK is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for COTG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COTG or TRFK?

TRFK has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.

What is the main difference between COTG and TRFK?

COTG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TRFK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for COTG and 0.60% for TRFK.