COTG vs. RBLU
COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) and RBLU (T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. COTG is actively managed, while RBLU is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. COTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for RBLU.
Performance
COTG vs. RBLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COTG achieves a 17.32% return, which is significantly higher than RBLU's -79.08% return.
COTG
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -11.21%
- YTD
- 17.32%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RBLU
- 1D
- -6.23%
- 1M
- -20.33%
- YTD
- -79.08%
- 6M
- -84.26%
- 1Y
- -86.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COTG vs. RBLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 17.32% | -21.71% |
RBLU T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF | -79.08% | -69.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between COTG and RBLU is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025 | -0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COTG vs. RBLU — Risk / Return Rank
COTG
RBLU
COTG vs. RBLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF (RBLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COTG | RBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.28 | -0.58 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
COTG vs. RBLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COTG drawdown since its inception was -25.69%, smaller than the maximum RBLU drawdown of -94.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTG and RBLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COTG | RBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.69% | -94.59% | +68.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -94.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.48% | -94.16% | +70.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.35% | -42.88% | +34.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 61.69% | — |
Volatility
COTG vs. RBLU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COTG | RBLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 37.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 99.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.65% | 119.35% | -78.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.65% | 117.21% | -76.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.65% | 117.21% | -76.56% |
COTG vs. RBLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
COTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than RBLU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
COTG vs. RBLU - Dividend Comparison
COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RBLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RBLU T-Rex 2X Long RBLX Daily Target ETF | 6.19% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COTG and RBLU have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for RBLU.
RBLU has the higher dividend yield at 6.19%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for COTG and 1.05% for RBLU.
Find the right allocation for COTG and RBLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer