COTG vs. QTAP
Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP).
COTG and QTAP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COTG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Sep 18, 2025. QTAP is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Apr 1, 2021.
Performance
COTG vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
COTG vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 29.11% | -21.71% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 3.02% | 2.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COTG achieves a 29.11% return, which is significantly higher than QTAP's 3.02% return.
COTG
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -4.20%
- YTD
- 29.11%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTAP
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 3.02%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 21.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COTG vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
COTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
COTG vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
COTG
QTAP
COTG vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COTG | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.64 | -0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between COTG and QTAP is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
COTG vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither COTG nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
COTG vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COTG drawdown since its inception was -23.44%, smaller than the maximum QTAP drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTG and QTAP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| COTG | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.44% | -29.44% | +6.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.89% | 0.00% | -5.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.60% | -5.21% | -3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.68% | — |
Volatility
COTG vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| COTG | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.64% | 16.38% | +22.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.64% | 19.03% | +19.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.64% | 19.03% | +19.61% |