COTG vs. QTAP
COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. COTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.
Performance
COTG vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COTG achieves a 15.84% return, which is significantly higher than QTAP's 12.83% return.
COTG
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -14.19%
- YTD
- 15.84%
- 6M
- 17.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTAP
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 12.83%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 22.41%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- 12.65%
- 10Y*
- —
COTG vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 15.84% | -22.61% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 12.83% | 2.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between COTG and QTAP is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COTG vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
COTG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QTAP
COTG vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COTG | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.94 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 9.04 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 52.85 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COTG vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COTG drawdown since its inception was -25.69%, smaller than the maximum QTAP drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTG and QTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COTG | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.69% | -29.44% | +3.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.45% | -1.70% | -22.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.72% | -4.99% | -4.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.43% | — |
Volatility
COTG vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COTG | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.02% | 6.12% | +33.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.02% | 18.92% | +21.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.02% | 18.72% | +21.30% |
COTG vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
COTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
COTG vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither COTG nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
COTG and QTAP have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTAP.
COTG and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for COTG and 0.79% for QTAP.
Find the right allocation for COTG and QTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer