COTG vs. IXN
COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) and IXN (iShares Global Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COTG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while IXN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index. COTG is actively managed, while IXN is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. COTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IXN.
Performance
COTG vs. IXN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COTG achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly lower than IXN's 28.13% return.
COTG
- 1D
- 6.31%
- 1M
- -9.60%
- 6M
- -8.77%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IXN
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -4.72%
- 6M
- 25.36%
- YTD
- 28.13%
- 1Y
- 43.72%
- 3Y*
- 28.96%
- 5Y*
- 19.50%
- 10Y*
- 23.87%
COTG vs. IXN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 11.25% | -22.61% |
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 28.13% | 6.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between COTG and IXN is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | -0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COTG vs. IXN — Risk / Return Rank
COTG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IXN
COTG vs. IXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COTG | IXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.18 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.42 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COTG vs. IXN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COTG drawdown since its inception was -32.16%, smaller than the maximum IXN drawdown of -55.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTG and IXN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COTG | IXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.16% | -55.67% | +23.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.44% | -10.15% | -17.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.14% | -11.24% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.66% | — |
Volatility
COTG vs. IXN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COTG | IXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.99% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.28% | 26.28% | +15.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.28% | 25.68% | +15.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.28% | 24.75% | +16.53% |
COTG vs. IXN - Expense Ratio Comparison
COTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IXN's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
COTG vs. IXN - Dividend Comparison
COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 0.82% | 1.04% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.81% | 0.58% | 0.63% | 1.06% | 0.94% | 0.93% | 1.03% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COTG and IXN have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IXN is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IXN is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for COTG.
IXN has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.
COTG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IXN is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for COTG and 0.46% for IXN.
Find the right allocation for COTG and IXN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer