PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COTG vs. CRMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COTG vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COTG achieves a 20.04% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -56.09% return.


COTG

1D
2.32%
1M
-9.84%
YTD
20.04%
6M
10.13%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRMG

1D
-1.95%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
-56.09%
6M
-50.25%
1Y
-60.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COTG vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between COTG and CRMG is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025

-0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COTG vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COTG

CRMG
CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COTG vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

COTG vs. CRMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COTGCRMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

-0.65

+0.45

Drawdowns

COTG vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COTG drawdown since its inception was -25.69%, smaller than the maximum CRMG drawdown of -74.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTG and CRMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COTGCRMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.69%

-74.38%

+48.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-70.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.71%

-67.87%

+46.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-37.81%

+29.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.08%

Volatility

COTG vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COTGCRMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

34.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

63.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.63%

75.31%

-34.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.63%

75.62%

-34.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.63%

75.62%

-34.99%

COTG vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both COTG and CRMG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

COTG vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison

Neither COTG nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


COTG and CRMG have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COTG and CRMG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

COTG and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COTG and CRMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer