PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COTG vs. AMUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COTG vs. AMUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COTG achieves a 17.32% return, which is significantly lower than AMUU's 393.28% return.


COTG

1D
1.39%
1M
-11.21%
YTD
17.32%
6M
1.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMUU

1D
7.59%
1M
134.67%
YTD
393.28%
6M
368.74%
1Y
1,186.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COTG vs. AMUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COTG
Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF
17.32%-21.71%
AMUU
Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares
393.28%57.19%

Correlation

The correlation between COTG and AMUU is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COTG vs. AMUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COTG

AMUU
AMUU Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AMUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AMUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMUU Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COTG vs. AMUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

COTG vs. AMUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COTGAMUUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.28

4.45

-4.73

Drawdowns

COTG vs. AMUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COTG drawdown since its inception was -25.69%, smaller than the maximum AMUU drawdown of -56.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTG and AMUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COTGAMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.69%

-56.47%

+30.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.48%

0.00%

-23.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.35%

-22.84%

+14.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.68%

Volatility

COTG vs. AMUU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COTGAMUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

45.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

94.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.65%

129.66%

-89.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.65%

131.28%

-90.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.65%

131.28%

-90.63%

COTG vs. AMUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

COTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AMUU's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

COTG vs. AMUU - Dividend Comparison

COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%.


Frequently Asked Questions


COTG and AMUU have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for AMUU.

AMUU has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for COTG and 0.97% for AMUU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COTG and AMUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer