COTG vs. AMDG
COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) and AMDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
COTG vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COTG achieves a 17.32% return, which is significantly lower than AMDG's 391.03% return.
COTG
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -11.21%
- YTD
- 17.32%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDG
- 1D
- 7.70%
- 1M
- 134.89%
- YTD
- 391.03%
- 6M
- 367.32%
- 1Y
- 1,172.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COTG vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 17.32% | -21.71% |
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF | 391.03% | 56.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between COTG and AMDG is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COTG vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank
COTG
AMDG
COTG vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COTG | AMDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 9.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.28 | 3.36 | -3.65 |
Drawdowns
COTG vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COTG drawdown since its inception was -25.69%, smaller than the maximum AMDG drawdown of -63.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTG and AMDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COTG | AMDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.69% | -63.04% | +37.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -56.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.48% | 0.00% | -23.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.35% | -25.70% | +17.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 28.80% | — |
Volatility
COTG vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COTG | AMDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 45.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 94.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.65% | 129.64% | -88.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.65% | 130.26% | -89.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.65% | 130.26% | -89.61% |
COTG vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both COTG and AMDG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
COTG vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison
COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMDG Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF | 2.28% | 11.21% |
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COTG and AMDG have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG and AMDG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
AMDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.
Find the right allocation for COTG and AMDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer