COTG vs. AIVC
COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) and AIVC (Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COTG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while AIVC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg AI Value Chain Index. COTG is actively managed, while AIVC is passively managed. Their -0.28 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. COTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for AIVC.
Performance
COTG vs. AIVC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COTG achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly lower than AIVC's 51.80% return.
COTG
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- 6M
- -3.87%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
AIVC
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- 6M
- 43.84%
- YTD
- 51.80%
- 1Y
- 90.42%
- 3Y*
- 40.15%
- 5Y*
- 15.23%
- 10Y*
- 14.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $693.08K | $1.23M | $2.77M | |
| $653.21K | $1.05M | $1.51M |
COTG vs. AIVC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 12.60% | -22.61% |
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF | 51.80% | 9.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between COTG and AIVC is -0.28, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | -0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COTG vs. AIVC — Risk / Return Rank
COTG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AIVC
COTG vs. AIVC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COTG | AIVC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.70 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.10 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COTG vs. AIVC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COTG drawdown since its inception was -32.16%, smaller than the maximum AIVC drawdown of -56.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTG and AIVC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COTG | AIVC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.16% | -56.11% | +23.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -32.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -53.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.56% | -16.53% | -10.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.97% | -16.35% | +4.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.56% | — |
Volatility
COTG vs. AIVC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COTG | AIVC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.99% | 35.26% | +5.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.99% | 31.35% | +9.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.99% | 27.49% | +13.50% |
COTG vs. AIVC - Expense Ratio Comparison
COTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AIVC's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
COTG vs. AIVC - Dividend Comparison
COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF | 0.11% | 0.17% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.39% | 1.16% | 0.38% | 0.92% | 0.64% |
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COTG and AIVC have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIVC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIVC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for COTG.
AIVC has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.
COTG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AIVC is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for COTG and 0.59% for AIVC.
Find the right allocation for COTG and AIVC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer