COSW vs. PLTW
Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW).
COSW and PLTW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COSW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Oct 23, 2025. PLTW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Feb 18, 2025.
Performance
COSW vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
COSW vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF | 17.20% | -10.71% |
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | -22.30% | -3.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COSW achieves a 17.20% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -22.30% return.
COSW
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- 17.20%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTW
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- -22.30%
- 6M
- -27.82%
- 1Y
- 75.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COSW vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both COSW and PLTW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Return for Risk
COSW vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank
COSW
PLTW
COSW vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COSW | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.29 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between COSW and PLTW is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
COSW vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison
COSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.26%, less than PLTW's 114.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF | 12.26% | 4.96% |
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF | 114.64% | 72.40% |
Drawdowns
COSW vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COSW drawdown since its inception was -12.17%, smaller than the maximum PLTW drawdown of -45.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSW and PLTW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| COSW | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.17% | -45.33% | +33.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -45.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.28% | -36.44% | +33.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.05% | -16.44% | +12.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 19.20% | — |
Volatility
COSW vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| COSW | PLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 45.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.36% | 69.24% | -43.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.36% | 73.25% | -47.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.36% | 73.25% | -47.89% |