PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COSW vs. NVII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COSW vs. NVII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COSW achieves a 12.13% return, which is significantly lower than NVII's 15.50% return.


COSW

1D
0.92%
1M
-6.40%
YTD
12.13%
6M
2.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVII

1D
-3.35%
1M
6.25%
YTD
15.50%
6M
18.61%
1Y
62.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COSW vs. NVII - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COSW
Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF
12.13%-10.71%
NVII
REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF
15.50%1.52%

Correlation

The correlation between COSW and NVII is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025

-0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COSW vs. NVII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COSW

NVII
NVII Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
NVII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVII Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVII Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
NVII Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVII Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COSW vs. NVII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

COSW vs. NVII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COSWNVIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

2.04

-2.03

Drawdowns

COSW vs. NVII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COSW drawdown since its inception was -16.24%, smaller than the maximum NVII drawdown of -18.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSW and NVII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COSWNVIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.24%

-18.47%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.62%

-8.54%

-6.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-5.50%

+1.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.24%

Volatility

COSW vs. NVII - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COSWNVIIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.10%

34.40%

-8.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.10%

34.54%

-8.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.10%

34.54%

-8.44%

COSW vs. NVII - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both COSW and NVII have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

COSW vs. NVII - Dividend Comparison

COSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.13%, less than NVII's 51.55% yield.


PositionTTM2025
COSW
Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF
18.13%4.96%
NVII
REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF
51.55%29.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


COSW and NVII have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COSW and NVII have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

NVII has the higher dividend yield at 51.55%, compared with 18.13% for COSW.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and REX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COSW and NVII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer