COSW vs. IPDP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

COSW (Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. COSW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.

Performance

COSW vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

COSW

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: -6.40%
• YTD: 12.13%
• 6M: 2.92%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IPDP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COSW vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF	-6.01%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%

COSW vs. IPDP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	COSW	IPDP
Consumer Defensive	7.9%	3.9%
Basic Materials	-	1.5%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	3.6%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	18.6%
Healthcare	-	13.6%
Industrials	-	45.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	13.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

COSW vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COSW	IPDP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	—	—

Drawdowns

COSW vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COSW drawdown since its inception was -16.24%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSW and IPDP.

Drawdown Indicators

	COSW	IPDP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.24%	0.00%	-16.24%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.62%	0.00%	-14.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.17%	0.00%	-4.17%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	COSW	IPDP	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.10%	0.00%	+26.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.10%	0.00%	+26.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.10%	0.00%	+26.10%

COSW vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

COSW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

COSW vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison

COSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.13%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF	18.13%	4.96%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, COSW or IPDP?

On fees, COSW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, COSW or IPDP?

COSW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COSW or IPDP?

COSW has the higher dividend yield at 18.13%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

What is the main difference between COSW and IPDP?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COSW and 1.52% for IPDP.