COSW vs. GLDW
COSW (Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF) and GLDW (Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
COSW vs. GLDW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COSW achieves a 12.13% return, which is significantly higher than GLDW's 1.00% return.
COSW
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- YTD
- 12.13%
- 6M
- 2.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLDW
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COSW vs. GLDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF | 12.13% | -8.15% |
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | 1.00% | 7.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between COSW and GLDW is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COSW vs. GLDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COSW | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.42 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
COSW vs. GLDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COSW drawdown since its inception was -16.24%, smaller than the maximum GLDW drawdown of -23.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSW and GLDW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COSW | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.24% | -23.59% | +7.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.62% | -22.51% | +7.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -8.93% | +4.76% |
Volatility
COSW vs. GLDW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COSW | GLDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.10% | 36.90% | -10.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.10% | 36.90% | -10.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.10% | 36.90% | -10.80% |
COSW vs. GLDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both COSW and GLDW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
COSW vs. GLDW - Dividend Comparison
COSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.13%, less than GLDW's 19.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF | 18.13% | 4.96% |
GLDW Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF | 19.48% | 3.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COSW and GLDW have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COSW and GLDW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
GLDW has the higher dividend yield at 19.48%, compared with 18.13% for COSW.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and State Street.
Find the right allocation for COSW and GLDW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer