COST vs. PFMN.TO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) is a stock, while PFMN.TO (PICTON Market Neutral Equity Alternative Fund) is Long-Short fund actively managed by Picton Mahoney. Over the past 5 years, COST returned 22.12%/yr vs 3.49%/yr for PFMN.TO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

COST vs. PFMN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and PICTON Market Neutral Equity Alternative Fund (PFMN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

COST is traded in USD, while PFMN.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the PFMN.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COST achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than PFMN.TO's 0.75% return.

COST

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -6.35%
• YTD: 14.24%
• 6M: 11.38%
• 1Y: -0.24%
• 3Y*: 25.12%
• 5Y*: 22.12%
• 10Y*: 22.27%

PFMN.TO

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 0.75%
• 6M: 1.77%
• 1Y: 3.66%
• 3Y*: 6.31%
• 5Y*: 3.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COST vs. PFMN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation	14.24%	-5.39%	39.62%	49.00%	-19.05%	51.82%	32.67%	5.21%
PFMN.TO PICTON Market Neutral Equity Alternative Fund	0.75%	9.85%	6.11%	5.65%	-0.86%	6.15%	19.54%	0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between COST and PFMN.TO is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019	0.08

The correlation between COST and PFMN.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.11 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

COST vs. PFMN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COST

COST Risk / Return Rank: 37
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 32
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 39

PFMN.TO

PFMN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 47
PFMN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
PFMN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
PFMN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 46
PFMN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
PFMN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COST vs. PFMN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and PICTON Market Neutral Equity Alternative Fund (PFMN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COST	PFMN.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.08	0.73	-0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.02	1.12	-1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.13	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.10	1.13	-1.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.22	3.03	-3.25

COST vs. PFMN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COST Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the PFMN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COST and PFMN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COST vs. PFMN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COST drawdown since its inception was -53.39%, which is greater than PFMN.TO's maximum drawdown of -20.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COST and PFMN.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	COST	PFMN.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.39%	-20.42%	-32.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.14%	-3.94%	-11.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.74%	-5.44%	-15.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.40%	-9.34%	-22.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.23%	-0.69%	-9.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.36%	-2.47%	-10.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.67%	1.47%	+5.20%

Volatility

COST vs. PFMN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to PICTON Market Neutral Equity Alternative Fund (PFMN.TO) at 1.98%. This indicates that COST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFMN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COST	PFMN.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.44%	1.98%	+5.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.53%	4.62%	+9.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.80%	6.11%	+12.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.72%	9.51%	+13.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.95%	11.74%	+10.21%

Dividends

COST vs. PFMN.TO - Dividend Comparison

COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than PFMN.TO's 0.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation	0.55%	0.59%	0.49%	2.87%	0.76%	0.54%	3.38%	0.86%	1.08%	4.81%	1.09%	4.06%
PFMN.TO PICTON Market Neutral Equity Alternative Fund	0.77%	0.80%	0.00%	1.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COST and PFMN.TO in my portfolio?

COST and PFMN.TO have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.