PFMN.TO vs. PFLS.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Picton Mahoney Fortified Market Neutral Alternative Fund (PFMN.TO) and Picton Mahoney Fortified Long Short Alternative Fund (PFLS.TO).

PFMN.TO and PFLS.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day.

Performance

PFMN.TO vs. PFLS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Picton Mahoney Fortified Market Neutral Alternative Fund (PFMN.TO) and Picton Mahoney Fortified Long Short Alternative Fund (PFLS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PFMN.TO vs. PFLS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PFMN.TO Picton Mahoney Fortified Market Neutral Alternative Fund	-0.40%	4.86%	15.06%	3.13%	5.43%	6.10%	10.17%
PFLS.TO Picton Mahoney Fortified Long Short Alternative Fund	0.24%	13.69%	19.22%	6.68%	0.48%	18.51%	20.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFMN.TO achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly lower than PFLS.TO's 0.24% return.

PFMN.TO

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: -0.65%
• YTD: -0.40%
• 6M: 0.79%
• 1Y: 5.70%
• 3Y*: 6.69%
• 5Y*: 6.41%
• 10Y*: —

PFLS.TO

• 1D: 1.59%
• 1M: -3.43%
• YTD: 0.24%
• 6M: 3.12%
• 1Y: 15.58%
• 3Y*: 12.24%
• 5Y*: 10.31%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFMN.TO vs. PFLS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

PFMN.TO vs. PFLS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFMN.TO

PFMN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 55
PFMN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
PFMN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
PFMN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 53
PFMN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
PFMN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 45

PFLS.TO

PFLS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 81
PFLS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
PFLS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
PFLS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 78
PFLS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
PFLS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFMN.TO vs. PFLS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Picton Mahoney Fortified Market Neutral Alternative Fund (PFMN.TO) and Picton Mahoney Fortified Long Short Alternative Fund (PFLS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PFMN.TO	PFLS.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	1.47	-0.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	2.15	-0.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.30	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	2.26	-0.76
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.22	9.33	-5.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PFMN.TO vs. PFLS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFMN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the PFLS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFMN.TO and PFLS.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PFMN.TO	PFLS.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00	1.47	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	0.78	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	1.03	-0.26

Correlation

The correlation between PFMN.TO and PFLS.TO is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PFMN.TO vs. PFLS.TO - Dividend Comparison

PFMN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, while PFLS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PFMN.TO Picton Mahoney Fortified Market Neutral Alternative Fund	0.80%	0.80%	0.00%	1.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.09%
PFLS.TO Picton Mahoney Fortified Long Short Alternative Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PFMN.TO vs. PFLS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFMN.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.04%, which is greater than PFLS.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFMN.TO and PFLS.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFMN.TO	PFLS.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.04%	-11.82%	-1.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.49%	-6.98%	+3.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-4.24%	-11.82%	+7.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.69%	-4.13%	+2.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.19%	-2.41%	+1.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.24%	1.69%	-0.45%

Volatility

PFMN.TO vs. PFLS.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Picton Mahoney Fortified Market Neutral Alternative Fund (PFMN.TO) is 1.98%, while Picton Mahoney Fortified Long Short Alternative Fund (PFLS.TO) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that PFMN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFLS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFMN.TO	PFLS.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.98%	3.80%	-1.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.24%	7.52%	-4.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.76%	10.64%	-4.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.01%	13.38%	-5.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.87%	13.54%	-3.67%