PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COST vs. DFS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COST vs. DFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Discover Financial Services (DFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


COST

1D
0.68%
1M
-4.91%
YTD
14.24%
6M
11.38%
1Y
-1.48%
3Y*
25.12%
5Y*
22.12%
10Y*
22.27%

DFS

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COST vs. DFS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
14.24%-5.39%39.62%49.00%-19.05%51.82%32.67%45.70%10.60%22.37%
DFS
Discover Financial Services
0.00%15.88%57.32%18.20%-13.55%29.78%10.13%46.94%-21.80%8.92%

Correlation

The correlation between COST and DFS is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2007

0.34

The correlation between COST and DFS shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (3 years) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

COST:

$293.59B

DFS:

$10.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

COST:

$11.12B

DFS:

$7.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

COST:

$12.48B

DFS:

$4.40B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COST vs. DFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

DFS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COST vs. DFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Discover Financial Services (DFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COSTDFSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.22

COST vs. DFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COST vs. DFS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COSTDFSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.67%

Volatility

COST vs. DFS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COSTDFSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.95%

Dividends

COST vs. DFS - Dividend Comparison

COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while DFS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.55%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%
DFS
Discover Financial Services
0.00%0.35%1.62%2.40%2.35%1.63%1.94%1.98%2.54%1.69%1.61%2.01%

Financials

COST vs. DFS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Costco Wholesale Corporation and Discover Financial Services. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
70.53B
5.49B
(COST) Total Revenue
(DFS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


COST and DFS have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COST and DFS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer