PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COSIX vs. SLMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COSIX vs. SLMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Strategic Income Fund (COSIX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Class A (SLMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COSIX achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than SLMCX's 46.25% return. Over the past 10 years, COSIX has underperformed SLMCX with an annualized return of 3.32%, while SLMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 26.53% annualized return.


COSIX

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.81%
6M
0.54%
YTD
0.77%
1Y
2.78%
3Y*
5.85%
5Y*
1.64%
10Y*
3.32%
ALL TIME*
5.43%

SLMCX

1D
0.43%
1M
-3.16%
6M
31.43%
YTD
46.25%
1Y
85.36%
3Y*
39.19%
5Y*
23.50%
10Y*
26.53%
ALL TIME*
23.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

COSIX vs. SLMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COSIX
Columbia Strategic Income Fund
0.77%6.98%4.50%9.86%-11.65%1.34%7.12%10.19%-0.96%5.48%
SLMCX
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Class A
46.25%37.32%26.67%44.27%-31.14%38.97%44.45%54.15%-8.12%34.08%

Correlation

The correlation between COSIX and SLMCX is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1986

0.20

The correlation between COSIX and SLMCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.36 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COSIX vs. SLMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

COSIX
COSIX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
COSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
COSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
COSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
COSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

SLMCX
SLMCX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SLMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SLMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

COSIX vs. SLMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Strategic Income Fund (COSIX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Class A (SLMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COSIXSLMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.43

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

6.48

-5.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.47

21.12

-15.66

COSIX vs. SLMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the SLMCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COSIX and SLMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COSIX vs. SLMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COSIX drawdown since its inception was -27.69%, smaller than the maximum SLMCX drawdown of -68.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSIX and SLMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COSIXSLMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.69%

-68.10%

+40.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.21%

-12.79%

+10.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.59%

-29.13%

+25.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.88%

-37.32%

+20.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.88%

-37.32%

+20.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-8.15%

+7.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-12.97%

+10.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

3.90%

-3.31%

Volatility

COSIX vs. SLMCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Strategic Income Fund (COSIX) is 0.75%, while Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Class A (SLMCX) has a volatility of 9.67%. This indicates that COSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COSIXSLMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

9.67%

-8.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.31%

23.32%

-21.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88%

29.58%

-26.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.57%

26.91%

-22.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.15%

26.38%

-22.23%

COSIX vs. SLMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

COSIX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than SLMCX's 1.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

COSIX vs. SLMCX - Dividend Comparison

COSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.08%, less than SLMCX's 6.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COSIX
Columbia Strategic Income Fund
5.08%4.94%5.20%5.03%3.56%3.86%3.24%3.71%4.25%3.51%3.09%4.20%
SLMCX
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Class A
6.46%9.45%14.27%5.16%9.42%11.75%10.40%11.44%12.33%11.15%8.19%10.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


COSIX and SLMCX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLMCX has higher volatility (9.67%) compared to COSIX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COSIX dropped -27.69% vs SLMCX's -68.10%.

SLMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COSIX and SLMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer