COSIX vs. MFEGX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

COSIX (Columbia Strategic Income Fund) and MFEGX (MFS Growth Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - COSIX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by Columbia, while MFEGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000® Growth Index. Over the past 10 years, COSIX returned 3.60%/yr vs 18.12%/yr for MFEGX. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COSIX charges 0.92%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for MFEGX.

Performance

COSIX vs. MFEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Strategic Income Fund (COSIX) and MFS Growth Fund Class A (MFEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COSIX achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly lower than MFEGX's 3.58% return. Over the past 10 years, COSIX has underperformed MFEGX with an annualized return of 3.60%, while MFEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.12% annualized return.

COSIX

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.87%
• YTD: 1.54%
• 6M: 1.63%
• 1Y: 4.65%
• 3Y*: 6.36%
• 5Y*: 1.85%
• 10Y*: 3.60%

MFEGX

• 1D: -1.47%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: 3.58%
• 6M: 2.49%
• 1Y: 13.06%
• 3Y*: 25.27%
• 5Y*: 12.65%
• 10Y*: 18.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COSIX vs. MFEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
COSIX Columbia Strategic Income Fund	1.54%	6.98%	4.50%	9.86%	-11.65%	1.34%	7.12%	10.19%	-0.96%	5.48%
MFEGX MFS Growth Fund Class A	3.58%	12.06%	51.46%	35.81%	-31.31%	23.28%	36.29%	37.35%	2.04%	30.52%

Correlation

The correlation between COSIX and MFEGX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 1993	0.16

Over the past year, COSIX and MFEGX have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

COSIX vs. MFEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COSIX

COSIX Risk / Return Rank: 40
COSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
COSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
COSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
COSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
COSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 43

MFEGX

MFEGX Risk / Return Rank: 10
MFEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
MFEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
MFEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
MFEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
MFEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COSIX vs. MFEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Strategic Income Fund (COSIX) and MFS Growth Fund Class A (MFEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COSIX	MFEGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	0.85	+0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	1.25	+1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.16	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	0.82	+1.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.55	2.63	+5.92

COSIX vs. MFEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the MFEGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COSIX and MFEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COSIX vs. MFEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COSIX drawdown since its inception was -27.69%, smaller than the maximum MFEGX drawdown of -72.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSIX and MFEGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	COSIX	MFEGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.69%	-72.42%	+44.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.21%	-17.39%	+15.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.17%	-23.28%	+19.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.88%	-36.27%	+19.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.88%	-36.27%	+19.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	-2.78%	+2.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.47%	-22.19%	+19.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.57%	5.41%	-4.84%

Volatility

COSIX vs. MFEGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Strategic Income Fund (COSIX) is 0.77%, while MFS Growth Fund Class A (MFEGX) has a volatility of 6.54%. This indicates that COSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COSIX	MFEGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.77%	6.54%	-5.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.25%	13.39%	-11.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.92%	16.83%	-13.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.56%	22.25%	-17.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.17%	21.43%	-17.26%

COSIX vs. MFEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

COSIX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than MFEGX's 0.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

COSIX vs. MFEGX - Dividend Comparison

COSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, less than MFEGX's 16.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COSIX Columbia Strategic Income Fund	4.98%	4.94%	5.20%	5.03%	3.56%	3.86%	3.24%	3.71%	4.25%	3.51%	3.09%	4.20%
MFEGX MFS Growth Fund Class A	16.30%	16.88%	28.04%	5.30%	1.14%	2.98%	7.45%	1.68%	3.96%	2.65%	1.68%	3.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COSIX and MFEGX in my portfolio?

COSIX and MFEGX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COSIX or MFEGX?

MFEGX has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to COSIX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COSIX dropped -27.69% vs MFEGX's -72.42%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.