PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COSIX vs. LBSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COSIX vs. LBSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Strategic Income Fund (COSIX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COSIX achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly lower than LBSAX's 8.70% return. Over the past 10 years, COSIX has underperformed LBSAX with an annualized return of 3.60%, while LBSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.31% annualized return.


COSIX

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.87%
YTD
1.54%
6M
1.63%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
6.36%
5Y*
1.85%
10Y*
3.60%

LBSAX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.36%
YTD
8.70%
6M
8.08%
1Y
20.09%
3Y*
15.58%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
12.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COSIX vs. LBSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COSIX
Columbia Strategic Income Fund
1.54%6.98%4.50%9.86%-11.65%1.34%7.12%10.19%-0.96%5.48%
LBSAX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A
8.70%15.58%14.73%10.26%-5.19%25.97%7.48%27.84%-4.62%19.96%

Correlation

The correlation between COSIX and LBSAX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2002

0.20

Over the past year, COSIX and LBSAX have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.20, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COSIX vs. LBSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COSIX
COSIX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
COSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
COSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
COSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
COSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

LBSAX
LBSAX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LBSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LBSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
LBSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
LBSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
LBSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COSIX vs. LBSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Strategic Income Fund (COSIX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COSIXLBSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.41

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

3.84

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.55

14.45

-5.90

COSIX vs. LBSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the LBSAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COSIX and LBSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COSIX vs. LBSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COSIX drawdown since its inception was -27.69%, smaller than the maximum LBSAX drawdown of -47.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSIX and LBSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COSIXLBSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.69%

-47.89%

+20.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.21%

-5.52%

+3.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.17%

-13.03%

+8.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.88%

-17.16%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.88%

-32.82%

+15.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-1.03%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.47%

-5.24%

+2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.57%

1.47%

-0.90%

Volatility

COSIX vs. LBSAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Strategic Income Fund (COSIX) is 0.77%, while Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) has a volatility of 2.65%. This indicates that COSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LBSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COSIXLBSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

2.65%

-1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.25%

6.90%

-4.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92%

9.19%

-6.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.56%

13.26%

-8.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.17%

15.70%

-11.53%

COSIX vs. LBSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

COSIX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than LBSAX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

COSIX vs. LBSAX - Dividend Comparison

COSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than LBSAX's 4.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COSIX
Columbia Strategic Income Fund
4.98%4.94%5.20%5.03%3.56%3.86%3.24%3.71%4.25%3.51%3.09%4.20%
LBSAX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A
4.72%5.11%5.78%4.72%3.62%2.65%1.52%2.68%7.36%3.83%3.60%8.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


COSIX and LBSAX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LBSAX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to COSIX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COSIX dropped -27.69% vs LBSAX's -47.89%.

LBSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COSIX and LBSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer