CORN vs. CGMU

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

CORN (Teucrium Corn Fund) and CGMU (Capital Group Municipal Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CORN is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Corn Fund Benchmark, while CGMU is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Capital Group. CORN is passively managed, while CGMU is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CORN returned -8.83%/yr vs 4.46%/yr for CGMU. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. CORN charges 2.19%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for CGMU.

Performance

CORN vs. CGMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN) and Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CORN achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly lower than CGMU's 1.64% return.

CORN

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 4.46%
• 6M: 2.33%
• YTD: -1.02%
• 1Y: 1.62%
• 3Y*: -8.83%
• 5Y*: -3.05%
• 10Y*: -1.15%

CGMU

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.25%
• 6M: 1.01%
• YTD: 1.64%
• 1Y: 5.97%
• 3Y*: 4.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CORN vs. CGMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CORN Teucrium Corn Fund	-1.02%	-5.54%	-12.98%	-19.90%	-1.32%
CGMU Capital Group Municipal Income ETF	1.64%	5.19%	2.64%	6.76%	4.65%

Correlation

The correlation between CORN and CGMU is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2022	-0.04

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between CORN and CGMU has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.04 to -0.25, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Return for Risk

CORN vs. CGMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CORN

CORN Risk / Return Rank: 11
CORN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
CORN Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
CORN Omega Ratio Rank: 10
CORN Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
CORN Martin Ratio Rank: 11

CGMU

CGMU Risk / Return Rank: 79
CGMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CGMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CGMU Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CGMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
CGMU Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CORN vs. CGMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN) and Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CORN	CGMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.10	2.62	-2.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.25	3.71	-3.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.55	-0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.12	2.35	-2.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.35	7.45	-7.10

CORN vs. CGMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CORN Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is lower than the CGMU Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CORN and CGMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CORN vs. CGMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CORN drawdown since its inception was -78.09%, which is greater than CGMU's maximum drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORN and CGMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	CORN	CGMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.09%	-4.11%	-73.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.86%	-2.55%	-11.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.56%	-3.89%	-30.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.68%	-0.65%	-66.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.18%	-0.83%	-50.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.70%	0.80%	+3.90%

Volatility

CORN vs. CGMU - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium Corn Fund (CORN) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) at 0.54%. This indicates that CORN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CORN	CGMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.59%	0.54%	+6.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.85%	1.76%	+11.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.62%	2.29%	+13.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.26%	3.44%	+15.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.30%	3.44%	+15.86%

CORN vs. CGMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CORN has a 2.19% expense ratio, which is higher than CGMU's 0.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

CORN vs. CGMU - Dividend Comparison

CORN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGMU Capital Group Municipal Income ETF	3.34%	3.32%	3.21%	3.08%	0.49%
CORN Teucrium Corn Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CORN and CGMU in my portfolio?

CORN and CGMU have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CORN or CGMU?

CORN has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to CGMU (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CORN dropped -78.09% vs CGMU's -4.11%.

Which ETF is better, CORN or CGMU?

On 3-year performance, CGMU leads with 4.46% vs -8.83% for CORN. On fees, CGMU is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, CGMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CORN or CGMU?

Over the 3-year period, CGMU has performed better with a 4.46% return vs -8.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CORN or CGMU?

CGMU is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 2.19% for CORN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CORN or CGMU?

CGMU has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 0.00% for CORN.

What is the main difference between CORN and CGMU?

CORN is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while CGMU is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 2.19% for CORN and 0.27% for CGMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.