CORD vs. SPXU
CORD (T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF) and SPXU (ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500) are both exchange-traded funds - CORD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Tuttle Capital Management, while SPXU is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index (-300%). CORD is actively managed, while SPXU is passively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CORD charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SPXU.
Performance
CORD vs. SPXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CORD achieves a -88.71% return, which is significantly lower than SPXU's -20.19% return.
CORD
- 1D
- 11.26%
- 1M
- -24.83%
- YTD
- -88.71%
- 6M
- -84.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXU
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- YTD
- -20.19%
- 6M
- -17.81%
- 1Y
- -43.92%
- 3Y*
- -40.85%
- 5Y*
- -33.55%
- 10Y*
- -41.98%
CORD vs. SPXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CORD T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF | -88.71% | 53.14% |
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | -20.19% | -9.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between CORD and SPXU is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CORD vs. SPXU — Risk / Return Rank
CORD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPXU
CORD vs. SPXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF (CORD) and ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 (SPXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CORD | SPXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.79 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.61 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CORD vs. SPXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CORD drawdown since its inception was -93.69%, smaller than the maximum SPXU drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORD and SPXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CORD | SPXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.69% | -99.99% | +6.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -47.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -84.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -90.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.63% | -99.99% | +7.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.30% | -93.33% | +35.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 29.37% | — |
Volatility
CORD vs. SPXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CORD | SPXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 185.44% | 37.35% | +148.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 185.44% | 50.62% | +134.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 185.44% | 53.43% | +132.01% |
CORD vs. SPXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CORD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXU's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
CORD vs. SPXU - Dividend Comparison
CORD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPXU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CORD T-Rex 2X Inverse CRWV Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPXU ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 | 7.35% | 7.02% | 9.53% | 7.06% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.70% | 2.14% | 1.41% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CORD and SPXU have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXU is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXU is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CORD.
SPXU has the higher dividend yield at 7.35%, compared with 0.00% for CORD.
CORD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SPXU is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Tuttle Capital Management and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CORD and 0.90% for SPXU.
Find the right allocation for CORD and SPXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer