CORB vs. IBTM
CORB (AB Core Bond ETF) and IBTM (iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. CORB is actively managed, while IBTM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CORB charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTM.
Performance
CORB vs. IBTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CORB achieves a 0.12% return, which is significantly higher than IBTM's -0.32% return.
CORB
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTM
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- -0.32%
- 6M
- -0.47%
- 1Y
- 4.02%
- 3Y*
- 2.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CORB vs. IBTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CORB AB Core Bond ETF | 0.12% | 0.21% |
IBTM iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF | -0.32% | 0.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between CORB and IBTM is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CORB vs. IBTM — Risk / Return Rank
CORB
IBTM
CORB vs. IBTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Core Bond ETF (CORB) and iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CORB | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.21 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
CORB vs. IBTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CORB drawdown since its inception was -3.08%, smaller than the maximum IBTM drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORB and IBTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CORB | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -13.60% | +10.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -2.21% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.98% | -4.82% | +3.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.11% | — |
Volatility
CORB vs. IBTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CORB | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.96% | 4.10% | -0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.96% | 7.56% | -3.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.96% | 7.56% | -3.60% |
CORB vs. IBTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CORB has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTM's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
CORB vs. IBTM - Dividend Comparison
CORB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than IBTM's 3.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CORB AB Core Bond ETF | 2.40% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBTM iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF | 3.94% | 3.87% | 3.96% | 3.39% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, CORB and IBTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, IBTM is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTM is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CORB.
IBTM has the higher dividend yield at 3.94%, compared with 2.40% for CORB.
They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for CORB and 0.07% for IBTM.
Find the right allocation for CORB and IBTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer