CORB vs. OILK
CORB (AB Core Bond ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CORB is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. CORB is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.44, they often move in opposite directions. CORB charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
CORB vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CORB achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 48.61% return.
CORB
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- 6M
- -0.62%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 5.96%
- 1M
- -3.25%
- 6M
- 43.94%
- YTD
- 48.61%
- 1Y
- 34.29%
- 3Y*
- 13.21%
- 5Y*
- 14.35%
- 10Y*
- —
CORB vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CORB AB Core Bond ETF | -0.50% | 0.41% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 48.61% | -3.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between CORB and OILK is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025 | -0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CORB vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
CORB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OILK
CORB vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Core Bond ETF (CORB) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CORB | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.63 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.86 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CORB vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CORB drawdown since its inception was -3.08%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORB and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CORB | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.08% | -83.76% | +80.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.28% | -12.81% | +10.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.08% | -32.40% | +31.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.92% | — |
Volatility
CORB vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CORB | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.99% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 25.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.10% | 29.40% | -25.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.10% | 30.47% | -26.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.10% | 35.99% | -31.89% |
CORB vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
CORB has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
CORB vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
CORB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than OILK's 8.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CORB AB Core Bond ETF | 2.76% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.79% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CORB and OILK have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CORB is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CORB is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.79%, compared with 2.76% for CORB.
CORB is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for CORB and 0.68% for OILK.
Find the right allocation for CORB and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer