PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COR vs. FTS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COR vs. FTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cencora Inc. (COR) and Fortis Inc (FTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COR achieves a -16.27% return, which is significantly lower than FTS's 11.40% return. Over the past 10 years, COR has outperformed FTS with an annualized return of 17.47%, while FTS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.07% annualized return.


COR

1D
0.07%
1M
10.42%
YTD
-16.27%
6M
-18.27%
1Y
-3.81%
3Y*
17.14%
5Y*
20.65%
10Y*
17.47%

FTS

1D
0.87%
1M
2.11%
YTD
11.40%
6M
13.52%
1Y
22.71%
3Y*
14.70%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
10.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COR vs. FTS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COR
Cencora Inc.
-16.27%51.48%10.37%25.33%26.26%44.09%23.37%23.51%-17.57%19.51%
FTS
Fortis Inc
11.40%29.62%5.81%7.38%-13.69%22.73%1.91%29.00%-5.86%24.45%

Correlation

The correlation between COR and FTS is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

COR:

$55.03B

FTS:

$28.94B

EPS

COR:

$13.07

FTS:

CA$3.40

PE Ratio

COR:

21.55

FTS:

23.41

PEG Ratio

COR:

10.24

FTS:

3.41

PS Ratio

COR:

0.17

FTS:

3.45

PB Ratio

COR:

16.20

FTS:

1.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

COR:

$328.68B

FTS:

CA$12.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

COR:

$11.66B

FTS:

CA$7.44B

EBITDA (TTM)

COR:

$3.64B

FTS:

CA$5.80B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COR vs. FTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COR
COR Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
COR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
COR Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
COR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
COR Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

FTS
FTS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTS Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTS Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COR vs. FTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cencora Inc. (COR) and Fortis Inc (FTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CORFTSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.30

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

3.66

-3.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.33

9.05

-9.38

COR vs. FTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COR Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the FTS Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COR and FTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COR vs. FTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COR drawdown since its inception was -71.01%, which is greater than FTS's maximum drawdown of -34.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COR and FTS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CORFTSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.01%

-34.36%

-36.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.44%

-6.23%

-26.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.44%

-14.46%

-17.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.44%

-29.96%

-2.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.44%

-34.36%

+1.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.54%

-2.01%

-22.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.62%

-6.83%

-6.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.68%

2.52%

+9.16%

Volatility

COR vs. FTS - Volatility Comparison

Cencora Inc. (COR) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to Fortis Inc (FTS) at 4.93%. This indicates that COR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CORFTSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.51%

4.93%

+1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.93%

10.55%

+16.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.20%

13.48%

+16.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.30%

16.31%

+5.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.48%

18.94%

+8.54%

Dividends

COR vs. FTS - Dividend Comparison

COR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than FTS's 3.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COR
Cencora Inc.
0.83%0.67%0.93%0.96%1.13%5.13%6.74%7.48%2.07%1.61%1.77%1.17%
FTS
Fortis Inc
3.23%3.42%4.62%4.50%4.48%3.40%3.54%3.31%3.35%4.43%4.94%0.00%

Financials

COR vs. FTS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cencora Inc. and Fortis Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
78.36B
3.39B
(COR) Total Revenue
(FTS) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. COR values in USD, FTS values in CAD

COR vs. FTS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cencora Inc. and Fortis Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
4.6%
27.6%
Portfolio components
COR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cencora Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.59B and revenue of 78.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.6%.

FTS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc reported a gross profit of 935.41M and revenue of 3.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.

COR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cencora Inc. reported an operating income of 1.14B and revenue of 78.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.5%.

FTS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc reported an operating income of 935.41M and revenue of 3.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.6%.

COR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cencora Inc. reported a net income of 1.64B and revenue of 78.36B, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.

FTS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc reported a net income of 524.35M and revenue of 3.39B, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


COR and FTS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COR has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to FTS (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COR dropped -71.01% vs FTS's -34.36%.

FTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COR and FTS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer