COPZ vs. USO
COPZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - COPZ is a Copper fund actively managed by Defiance, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. COPZ is actively managed, while USO is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.44, they often move in opposite directions. COPZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
COPZ vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
COPZ
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -27.83%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USO
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- -20.21%
- YTD
- 58.05%
- 6M
- 55.71%
- 1Y
- 49.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.34%
- 5Y*
- 16.82%
- 10Y*
- 2.02%
COPZ vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
COPZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF | -35.00% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 44.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between COPZ and USO is -0.44, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026 | -0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COPZ vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
COPZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USO
COPZ vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF (COPZ) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COPZ | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.76 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COPZ vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPZ drawdown since its inception was -49.79%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPZ and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPZ | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.79% | -98.19% | +48.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -30.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.29% | -88.37% | +42.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.27% | -75.32% | +46.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.34% | — |
Volatility
COPZ vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COPZ | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 39.67% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 110.71% | 43.65% | +67.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.71% | 36.40% | +74.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.71% | 39.04% | +71.67% |
COPZ vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
COPZ vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
Neither COPZ nor USO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
COPZ and USO have a correlation of -0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USO is cheaper at 0.86% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USO is cheaper with a 0.86% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for COPZ.
COPZ and USO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
COPZ is categorized as Copper, while USO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for COPZ and 0.86% for USO.
Find the right allocation for COPZ and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer