COPZ vs. SCOP
COPZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF) and SCOP (Sprott Physical Copper Trust) are both Copper funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COPZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for SCOP.
Performance
COPZ vs. SCOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
COPZ
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCOP
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COPZ vs. SCOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
COPZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF | 8.82% |
SCOP Sprott Physical Copper Trust | 0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between COPZ and SCOP is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2026 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COPZ vs. SCOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF (COPZ) and Sprott Physical Copper Trust (SCOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COPZ vs. SCOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPZ drawdown since its inception was -49.79%, which is greater than SCOP's maximum drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPZ and SCOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPZ | SCOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.79% | -11.09% | -38.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.76% | -8.11% | -23.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.67% | -5.90% | -22.77% |
Volatility
COPZ vs. SCOP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COPZ | SCOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 110.12% | 41.05% | +69.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.12% | 41.05% | +69.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.12% | 41.05% | +69.07% |
COPZ vs. SCOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than SCOP's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
COPZ vs. SCOP - Dividend Comparison
Neither COPZ nor SCOP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
COPZ and SCOP have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COPZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COPZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for SCOP.
COPZ and SCOP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for COPZ and 1.30% for SCOP.
Find the right allocation for COPZ and SCOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer