COPZ vs. MLPA

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

COPZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF) and MLPA (Global X MLP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COPZ is a Copper fund actively managed by Defiance, while MLPA is a MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP Infrastructure Index. COPZ is actively managed, while MLPA is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. COPZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for MLPA.

Performance

COPZ vs. MLPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF (COPZ) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

COPZ

• 1D: -6.77%
• 1M: -32.86%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MLPA

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: 5.69%
• 6M: 13.90%
• YTD: 18.84%
• 1Y: 19.55%
• 3Y*: 16.97%
• 5Y*: 17.70%
• 10Y*: 6.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COPZ vs. MLPA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
COPZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF	-38.59%
MLPA Global X MLP ETF	6.75%

Correlation

The correlation between COPZ and MLPA is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026	-0.30

Return for Risk

COPZ vs. MLPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MLPA

MLPA Risk / Return Rank: 54
MLPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
MLPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
MLPA Omega Ratio Rank: 52
MLPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
MLPA Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPZ vs. MLPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF (COPZ) and Global X MLP ETF (MLPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COPZ	MLPA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.57	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.23	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.36	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	6.17	—

Drawdowns

COPZ vs. MLPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPZ drawdown since its inception was -51.36%, smaller than the maximum MLPA drawdown of -78.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPZ and MLPA.

Drawdown Indicators

	COPZ	MLPA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.36%	-78.75%	+27.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.33%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.20%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.75%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-74.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.26%	-1.55%	-47.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.69%	-20.14%	-11.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.18%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	COPZ	MLPA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.09%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.52%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	108.90%	12.54%	+96.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	108.90%	17.99%	+90.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	108.90%	27.40%	+81.50%

COPZ vs. MLPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPA's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

COPZ vs. MLPA - Dividend Comparison

COPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MLPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.11%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COPZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MLPA Global X MLP ETF	7.11%	7.82%	7.25%	7.49%	7.30%	8.72%	13.84%	9.09%	10.00%	8.05%	7.15%	9.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COPZ and MLPA in my portfolio?

COPZ and MLPA have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, COPZ or MLPA?

On fees, MLPA is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, COPZ or MLPA?

MLPA is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for COPZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COPZ or MLPA?

MLPA has the higher dividend yield at 7.11%, compared with 0.00% for COPZ.

What is the main difference between COPZ and MLPA?

COPZ is categorized as Copper, while MLPA is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for COPZ and 0.77% for MLPA.