COPZ vs. BILS
COPZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF) and BILS (SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COPZ is a Copper fund actively managed by Defiance, while BILS is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg 3-12 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. COPZ is actively managed, while BILS is passively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COPZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BILS.
Performance
COPZ vs. BILS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
COPZ
- 1D
- -12.01%
- 1M
- -13.49%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BILS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- 3.84%
- 3Y*
- 4.61%
- 5Y*
- 3.33%
- 10Y*
- —
COPZ vs. BILS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
COPZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF | -28.95% |
BILS SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF | 1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between COPZ and BILS is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COPZ vs. BILS — Risk / Return Rank
COPZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BILS
COPZ vs. BILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF (COPZ) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF (BILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COPZ | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 34.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 127.82 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1,285.26 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COPZ vs. BILS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPZ drawdown since its inception was -49.79%, which is greater than BILS's maximum drawdown of -0.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPZ and BILS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPZ | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.79% | -0.41% | -49.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.30% | 0.00% | -41.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.87% | -0.04% | -28.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
COPZ vs. BILS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COPZ | BILS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 110.79% | 0.23% | +110.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.79% | 0.31% | +110.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.79% | 0.30% | +110.49% |
COPZ vs. BILS - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BILS's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
COPZ vs. BILS - Dividend Comparison
COPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BILS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILS SPDR Bloomberg 3-12 Month T-Bill ETF | 3.81% | 4.08% | 5.01% | 4.98% | 1.61% |
COPZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COPZ and BILS have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BILS is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BILS is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for COPZ.
BILS has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 0.00% for COPZ.
COPZ is categorized as Copper, while BILS is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for COPZ and 0.14% for BILS.
Find the right allocation for COPZ and BILS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer