COPX vs. THNQ

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) and THNQ (ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COPX is a Copper fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while THNQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, COPX returned 19.28%/yr vs 15.90%/yr for THNQ. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COPX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for THNQ.

Performance

COPX vs. THNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPX achieves a 19.75% return, which is significantly lower than THNQ's 35.69% return.

COPX

• 1D: 3.38%
• 1M: -3.82%
• YTD: 19.75%
• 6M: 29.13%
• 1Y: 106.27%
• 3Y*: 33.96%
• 5Y*: 19.28%
• 10Y*: 21.86%

THNQ

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 7.14%
• YTD: 35.69%
• 6M: 34.00%
• 1Y: 67.55%
• 3Y*: 33.39%
• 5Y*: 15.90%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COPX vs. THNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF	19.75%	93.50%	3.57%	8.38%	-0.76%	23.39%	111.22%
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	35.69%	29.83%	18.82%	56.81%	-39.84%	9.10%	60.92%

Correlation

The correlation between COPX and THNQ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.48
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020	0.47

The correlation between COPX and THNQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

COPX vs. THNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	COPX	THNQ
Basic Materials	96.7%	-
Industrials	3.3%	0.8%
Communication Services	-	10.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	1.4%
Healthcare	-	5.2%
Real Estate	-	0.7%
Technology	-	74.2%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

COPX vs. THNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPX

COPX Risk / Return Rank: 76
COPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
COPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
COPX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
COPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
COPX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

THNQ

THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 75
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 72
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPX vs. THNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COPX	THNQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	2.32	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	2.84	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.37	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.75	3.51	+0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.60	11.22	+0.38

COPX vs. THNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the THNQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPX and THNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COPX vs. THNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPX drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, which is greater than THNQ's maximum drawdown of -50.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPX and THNQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	COPX	THNQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.16%	-50.56%	-32.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.82%	-18.39%	-9.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.72%	-29.88%	-9.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.12%	-50.56%	+8.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.17%	-7.88%	-2.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.28%	-15.03%	-24.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.98%	5.74%	+3.24%

Volatility

COPX vs. THNQ - Volatility Comparison

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a higher volatility of 19.30% compared to ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) at 12.29%. This indicates that COPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COPX	THNQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.30%	12.29%	+7.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.15%	22.64%	+15.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.66%	27.89%	+15.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.00%	29.33%	+7.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.75%	28.82%	+6.93%

COPX vs. THNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than THNQ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

COPX vs. THNQ - Dividend Comparison

COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than THNQ's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF	2.24%	2.68%	1.80%	2.39%	3.14%	1.48%	1.30%	1.37%	2.59%	1.57%	0.60%	1.20%
THNQ ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.15%	0.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COPX and THNQ in my portfolio?

COPX and THNQ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COPX or THNQ?

COPX has higher volatility (19.30%) compared to THNQ (12.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPX dropped -83.16% vs THNQ's -50.56%.

Which ETF is better, COPX or THNQ?

On 5-year performance, COPX leads with 19.28% vs 15.90% for THNQ. On fees, COPX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, THNQ has been the lower-risk option at 12.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, COPX or THNQ?

Over the 5-year period, COPX has performed better with a 19.28% return vs 15.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, COPX or THNQ?

COPX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for THNQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COPX or THNQ?

COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.15% for THNQ.

What is the main difference between COPX and THNQ?

COPX is categorized as Copper, while THNQ is Technology Equities. COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while THNQ tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for COPX and 0.68% for THNQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.