COPX vs. SMH
COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COPX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, COPX returned 21.86%/yr vs 37.49%/yr for SMH. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COPX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
COPX vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COPX achieves a 19.75% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.15% return. Over the past 10 years, COPX has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 21.86%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.49% annualized return.
COPX
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- -6.46%
- YTD
- 19.75%
- 6M
- 29.13%
- 1Y
- 103.76%
- 3Y*
- 33.96%
- 5Y*
- 19.28%
- 10Y*
- 21.86%
SMH
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 72.15%
- 6M
- 75.62%
- 1Y
- 136.32%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 38.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
COPX vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 19.75% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 8.38% | -0.76% | 23.39% | 51.66% | 12.48% | -31.31% | 38.92% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.15% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between COPX and SMH is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010 | 0.50 |
The correlation between COPX and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (3 years) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
COPX vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
COPX
SMH
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
COPX
SMH
-
Industrials
COPX
SMH
-
Communication Services
COPX
-
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
COPX
-
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
COPX
-
SMH
-
Energy
COPX
-
SMH
-
Financial Services
COPX
-
SMH
-
Healthcare
COPX
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
COPX
-
SMH
-
Technology
COPX
-
SMH
Utilities
COPX
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COPX vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
COPX
SMH
COPX vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COPX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.60 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 9.18 | -5.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.60 | 33.74 | -22.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COPX vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPX drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, roughly equal to the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPX and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.16% | -84.96% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.82% | -14.93% | -12.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.72% | -35.74% | -3.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.12% | -45.30% | +3.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.41% | -45.30% | -20.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.17% | -2.81% | -7.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.28% | -41.04% | +1.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.98% | 4.06% | +4.92% |
Volatility
COPX vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a higher volatility of 19.30% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 16.25%. This indicates that COPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COPX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.30% | 16.25% | +3.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.15% | 27.73% | +10.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.66% | 33.20% | +10.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.00% | 35.47% | +1.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.75% | 32.82% | +2.93% |
COPX vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
COPX vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.24% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COPX and SMH have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COPX has higher volatility (19.30%) compared to SMH (16.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPX dropped -83.16% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.49% vs 21.86% for COPX. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SMH has been the lower-risk option at 16.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.49% return vs 21.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.
COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
COPX is categorized as Materials, while SMH is Semiconductors. COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for COPX and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COPX and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer