COPX vs. FDTS
COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) and FDTS (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - COPX is a Copper fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while FDTS is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, COPX returned 21.86%/yr vs 10.96%/yr for FDTS. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COPX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FDTS.
Performance
COPX vs. FDTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with COPX having a 19.75% return and FDTS slightly lower at 18.78%. Over the past 10 years, COPX has outperformed FDTS with an annualized return of 21.86%, while FDTS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.96% annualized return.
COPX
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- -3.82%
- YTD
- 19.75%
- 6M
- 29.13%
- 1Y
- 106.27%
- 3Y*
- 33.96%
- 5Y*
- 19.28%
- 10Y*
- 21.86%
FDTS
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -3.79%
- YTD
- 18.78%
- 6M
- 20.77%
- 1Y
- 44.72%
- 3Y*
- 24.70%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- 10.96%
COPX vs. FDTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 19.75% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 8.38% | -0.76% | 23.39% | 51.66% | 12.48% | -31.31% | 38.92% |
FDTS First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund | 18.78% | 51.17% | 2.44% | 10.96% | -15.34% | 11.79% | 12.90% | 18.71% | -23.71% | 36.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between COPX and FDTS is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2012 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, COPX and FDTS have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.45, meaning their price movements have been converging.
COPX vs. FDTS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
COPX
FDTS
Basic Materials
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
COPX
FDTS
Industrials
COPX
FDTS
Communication Services
COPX
-
FDTS
Consumer Cyclical
COPX
-
FDTS
Consumer Defensive
COPX
-
FDTS
Energy
COPX
-
FDTS
Financial Services
COPX
-
FDTS
Healthcare
COPX
-
FDTS
Real Estate
COPX
-
FDTS
Technology
COPX
-
FDTS
Utilities
COPX
-
FDTS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COPX vs. FDTS — Risk / Return Rank
COPX
FDTS
COPX vs. FDTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COPX | FDTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.42 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 3.43 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.60 | 11.78 | -0.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COPX vs. FDTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPX drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, which is greater than FDTS's maximum drawdown of -51.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPX and FDTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPX | FDTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.16% | -51.26% | -31.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.82% | -12.61% | -15.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.72% | -13.19% | -26.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.12% | -33.11% | -9.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.41% | -51.26% | -14.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.17% | -4.77% | -5.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.28% | -10.64% | -28.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.98% | 3.66% | +5.32% |
Volatility
COPX vs. FDTS - Volatility Comparison
Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a higher volatility of 19.30% compared to First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) at 8.44%. This indicates that COPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COPX | FDTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.30% | 8.44% | +10.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.15% | 15.54% | +22.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.66% | 18.27% | +25.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.00% | 29.42% | +7.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.75% | 24.92% | +10.83% |
COPX vs. FDTS - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FDTS's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
COPX vs. FDTS - Dividend Comparison
COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than FDTS's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.24% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
FDTS First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund | 2.53% | 2.94% | 3.94% | 2.90% | 3.71% | 3.01% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 1.96% | 2.08% | 1.78% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COPX and FDTS have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COPX has higher volatility (19.30%) compared to FDTS (8.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPX dropped -83.16% vs FDTS's -51.26%.
On 10-year performance, COPX leads with 21.86% vs 10.96% for FDTS. On fees, COPX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FDTS has been the lower-risk option at 8.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, COPX has performed better with a 21.86% return vs 10.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COPX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDTS.
FDTS has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 2.24% for COPX.
COPX is categorized as Copper, while FDTS is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while FDTS tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for COPX and 0.80% for FDTS.
COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COPX and FDTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer