COPX vs. COPZ
COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) and COPZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF) are both Copper funds. COPX is passively managed, while COPZ is actively managed. Their 0.99 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. COPX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for COPZ.
Performance
COPX vs. COPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
COPX
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 2.88%
- 6M
- -6.70%
- YTD
- 10.22%
- 1Y
- 89.44%
- 3Y*
- 27.01%
- 5Y*
- 18.54%
- 10Y*
- 18.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.76%
COPZ
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $193.89M | $197.23M | $300.83M | |
| $216.59K | $238.58K | $612.59K |
COPX vs. COPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | -6.67% |
COPZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF | -33.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between COPX and COPZ is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026 | 0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COPX vs. COPZ — Risk / Return Rank
COPX
COPZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
COPX vs. COPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF (COPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COPX | COPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.96 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COPX vs. COPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPX drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, which is greater than COPZ's maximum drawdown of -51.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPX and COPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPX | COPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.16% | -51.59% | -31.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.32% | -44.74% | +27.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.11% | -33.10% | -6.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.11% | — | — |
Volatility
COPX vs. COPZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COPX | COPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.58% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.74% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.77% | 106.63% | -60.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.28% | 106.63% | -69.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.87% | 106.63% | -70.76% |
COPX vs. COPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than COPZ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
COPX vs. COPZ - Dividend Comparison
COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, while COPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.45% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
COPZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, COPX and COPZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, COPX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COPX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for COPZ.
COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 0.00% for COPZ.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for COPX and 0.95% for COPZ.
Find the right allocation for COPX and COPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer