PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COPX vs. ASML
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COPX vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPX achieves a 19.75% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 74.80% return. Over the past 10 years, COPX has underperformed ASML with an annualized return of 21.86%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively higher 36.00% annualized return.


COPX

1D
3.38%
1M
-6.46%
YTD
19.75%
6M
29.13%
1Y
103.76%
3Y*
33.96%
5Y*
19.28%
10Y*
21.86%

ASML

1D
-1.89%
1M
17.83%
YTD
74.80%
6M
73.02%
1Y
138.89%
3Y*
37.59%
5Y*
22.97%
10Y*
36.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COPX vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
19.75%93.50%3.57%8.38%-0.76%23.39%51.66%12.48%-31.31%38.92%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
74.80%56.51%-7.70%39.91%-30.49%64.13%66.06%93.56%-9.80%56.23%

Correlation

The correlation between COPX and ASML is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COPX vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPX
COPX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
COPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
COPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

ASML
ASML Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPX vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COPXASMLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.45

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

7.83

-4.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.60

21.08

-9.48

COPX vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 3.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPX and ASML, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COPX vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPX drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPX and ASML.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COPXASMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.16%

-90.00%

+6.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.82%

-17.85%

-9.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.72%

-45.38%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.12%

-56.84%

+14.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.41%

-56.84%

-8.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.17%

-1.89%

-8.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.28%

-28.12%

-11.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.98%

6.63%

+2.35%

Volatility

COPX vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a higher volatility of 19.30% compared to ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) at 17.27%. This indicates that COPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COPXASMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.30%

17.27%

+2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.15%

34.58%

+3.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.66%

42.75%

+0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.00%

42.44%

-5.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.75%

38.72%

-2.97%

Dividends

COPX vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than ASML's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.47%0.97%0.97%0.86%1.27%0.50%0.50%1.40%0.94%0.64%0.92%0.73%
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
2.24%2.68%1.80%2.39%3.14%1.48%1.30%1.37%2.59%1.57%0.60%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


COPX and ASML have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COPX has higher volatility (19.30%) compared to ASML (17.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPX dropped -83.16% vs ASML's -90.00%.

ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COPX and ASML

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer